Uniformed officers are driving a marked car into an area known for heavy drug trafficking,
intending to investigate drug activity and anticipating encountering drug customers and lookouts.
One officer sees the suspect standing next to a building and holding an opaque bag. The suspect
looks in the direction of the officers and flees. The officers turn their car, watch the suspect run
through an alley, and eventually corner him on the street. One officer leaves the car, stops the
defendant, and conducts a frisk of the defendant, discovering a concealed handgun.
44. Which of the following statements is true regarding the legality of the “stop and frisk”?
a. The stop was illegal. The officers did not have specific, articulable facts to justify the stop.
b. The stop was legal. A brief investigative stop can be justified by the circumstances.
c. The stop was legal. The gun provided probable cause to justify the stop, a standard of proof
higher than reasonable suspicion.
d. The stop was illegal. The officers didn’t find any drugs on the suspect.
45. Which of the following facts cannot be used to provide justification for the stop?
a. It was an area known for heavy drug trafficking.
b. The suspect was standing next to a building holding an opaque bag.
c. The suspect’s unprovoked flight upon seeing the officers.
d. Discovery of the concealed handgun.
TRUE/FALSE
1. The use of precedent promotes fairness and consistency.
2. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” means over 95% certainty of guilt.
3. Legislatures did not become a principal source of law in the U.S. until the 20th century.
4. Tort law includes any wrong, hurt, or damage done to a person’s rights, body, reputation,
or property.