CASE 16.3
One might think that the appeals and postconviction review processes would routinely correct
situations in which a defendant was wrongfully convicted, but that is clearly not the case. Up
until the mid-1990s, public perception was that criminal defendants had gained too many rights
during the Warren era, and, as a result, far too many criminal defendants escaped criminal
punishment on technicalities (Uphoff, 2006). Such perceptions led many—including judges and
several Supreme Court justices—to deny that wrongful convictions were a major problem (see
Herrera v. Collins, 1993). Since 1989, though, over 329 inmates have been exonerated by DNA
evidence, largely due to the efforts of the Innocence Project, the Death Penalty Information
Center, and similar organizations (Innocence Project, 2015a; see also Zalman, Smith & Kiger,
2008). As a result of these exonerations—and media portrayals of them—nearly 40 states have
changed their laws to allow for appellate or postconviction review on the grounds of actual
innocence and the federal government enacted the Innocence Protection Act of 2004.
44. What reason for wrongful convictions plays a role in 72% of the DNA exonerations to
date?