1. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. addressed the issue of furnishing alcohol to minors.
a.
True
b.
False
2. A landowner’s highest duty is owed to licensees.
a.
True
b.
False
False
Easy
3. Tort issues are firmly ingrained in law and do not change.
a.
True
b.
False
False
Moderate
4. A defendant set off fireworks at a fully-licensed Fourth of July show. The result of the activity caused harm to the
plaintiff. In order for the plaintiff to win a case of negligence, he or she need only prove that it was foreseeable that the
defendant’s conduct might cause harm.
a.
True
b.
False
False
Moderate
5. Res ipsa loquitur shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Easy
6. The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states.
a.
True
b.
False
False
False
Easy
7. While hunting, Roger enters Adele’s property without permission and is injured by falling into a ditch that was
obscured by the underbrush. Under the common law, Adele is liable for Roger’s injuries.
a.
True
b.
False
False
Moderate
8. Most states recognize some form of comparative negligence.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Easy
9. Kenneth was exposed to radiation on his job in an environmental cleanup. In a lawsuit against his employer, the court
must decide the full extent of both present and future damages rather than allowing Kenneth to return to court years later
if medical problems develop at that time.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Moderate
10. A sports fan, injured by a hockey puck that flew into the stands during an NHL game, would be subject to the defense
of assumption of the risk in a suit to recover for her injuries.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Moderate
11. In strict liability, if a company sells a beverage in a can that has sharp edges and injures several consumers, it will be
held liable even if it didn’t know about the problem.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Easy
Moderate
12. In a strict liability case, the courts still consider if the defendant acted in a reasonable and prudent manner.
a.
True
b.
False
False
Moderate
Bloom’s: Comprehension
13. Silas asks his friend Shelby to come to his property to go fishing at his pond. If he fails to warn her that the dock has a
rotten spot and she falls through and is injured, Silas would be held liable in most states.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Moderate
Bloom’s: Application
14. A defendant engaging in an ultrahazardous activity is almost always liable for any harm that results.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Bloom’s: Knowledge
15. The duty of care that each of us must follow is to behave as a reasonable person.
a.
True
b.
False
True
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
16. In a negligence case, the plaintiff must establish
a.
duty, strict liability, causation, and injury.
b.
mens rea, breach, foreseeable harm, and injury.
c.
duty, actus reus, foreseeable harm, and causation.
d.
duty of due care, breach, causation, foreseeable harm, and damages.
Bloom’s: Comprehension
17. For the defendant to be liable in a negligence case, it must be proven that the type of harm caused by the defendant
Bloom’s: Knowledge
must have been reasonably foreseeable. This is referred to as
a.
proximate cause.
b.
duty of due care.
c.
factual cause.
d.
breach.
18. Annette drove through an intersection without looking and hit Vincent’s car that he had driven into the intersection
without obeying a stop sign. Annette sued Vincent. The jury found that Annette’s fault contributed 20 percent to the
collision and determined that her total loss was $100,000. Under comparative negligence, the jury should award Annette
a.
$20,000.
b.
$80,000.
c.
$100,000.
d.
nothing.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Application
19. Negligence concerns harm that
a.
is unforeseeable.
b.
arises intentionally.
c.
arises by accident.
d.
is always substantial.
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
20. Which of the following represents a landowner’s lowest liability?
a.
trespassing children
b.
licensees
c.
trespassing adults
d.
invitees
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
21. Bob, a weak swimmer, ignored warning signs in a recreational swimming area and went into deep water. He soon
grew tired and realized that he could not make it back to shore. Seeing Kelly, he cried out for help. Kelly, however,
ignored the pleas. Bob was finally saved by Dorothy, but suffered brain damage from being submerged during the ordeal.
Bob now sues Kelly for negligence for failing to try to save him. Bob will:
a.
prevail because society places a duty on people to help each other and Kelly breached this duty, resulting in
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
Bob’s injury.
b.
lose because Kelly had no legal duty to rescue him.
c.
lose even though Kelly had a legal duty to save him, since Bob will not be able to prove that Kelly’s failure to
act was the proximate cause of his injuries.
d.
lose because a reasonable person could not have foreseen that someone in a recreation area could not swim
well.
22. One morning, Miles accidentally dropped a thumbtack on the chair of the office manager where he worked. The office
manager sat on the tack and two days later, was hospitalized with an infection caused by the tack. Which of the following
is correct?
a.
Miles actions were negligent.
b.
No tort has been committed.
c.
Miles committed an intentional tort.
d.
Miles is strictly liable.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Evaluation
23. A plaintiff sues in negligence but has no direct proof that the defendant behaved unreasonably. Which of the following
is most likely to help the plaintiff?
a.
Res judicata
b.
Stare decisis
c.
Res ipsa loquitur
d.
Mens rea
Moderate
Bloom’s: Comprehension
24. Wayne worked in an office. He had no criminal record, had never had a complaint made against him about his work or
his conduct, and had been a faithful employee for nearly 20 years. One day, Wayne followed his supervisor to his home
and fatally shot him. The estate of the supervisor sued the company, claiming it should have been aware of Wayne’s
growing frustration with work. The company’s best defense will be that
a.
there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
b.
the incident occurred away from the office.
c.
the killing was the result of a personal conflict between Wayne and the supervisor.
d.
even if the company had been aware of Wayne’s difficulty with his supervisor, Wayne did not have any
criminal history.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Application
Moderate
Bloom’s: Evaluation
25. Which of the following acts resulting in injury would be negligence per se?
a.
Joe sold fireworks from his Indiana store (a legal activity) to Steve, an Illinois resident (a state that has made
owning fireworks illegal).
b.
June,while driving the speed limit, sideswiped the car next to her.
c.
A retailer sold glue containing benzene to a 14-year-old boy in violation of state law.
d.
Tammy accidentally dropped a heavy carton on Sasha’s foot while at work.
26. Which of the following statements regarding a negligence case is correct?
a.
A plaintiff must show that the defendant’s act was both the factual cause of her injury as well as a foreseeable
injury.
b.
A plaintiff must show that the defendant’s act was the factual cause of her injury even if the injury was not
foreseeable.
c.
A plaintiff must show that the defendant’s act created a foreseeable danger even if it was not the factual cause
of her injury.
d.
A plaintiff does not have to show that the defendant’s act either created a foreseeable danger or that the act was
the factual cause of her injury.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Comprehension
27. Under a state law, a dog owner is absolutely liable to any person who is injured by the dog. This is an example of
a.
negligence per se.
b.
strict liability.
c.
res ipsa loquitur.
d.
negligence.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Comprehension
28. If a court applies res ipsa loquitur
a.
the plaintiff needs to prove the case by a preponderance of the evidence.
b.
the plaintiff must prove the case by clear and convincing evidence.
c.
the defendant has the burden of proving he or she is not liable.
d.
the defendant is strictly liable.
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
29. Kelley went ice skating on a neighbor’s pond, but she fell through a thin area into icy waters. Kelley did not have
permission to be on the property, and the neighbor did not even know that she was there. Is the neighbor liable for
Moderate
Bloom’s: Comprehension
Kelley’s injuries?
a.
Yes. The neighbor should have posted “thin ice” notices.
b.
No. Kelley was a trespasser and the neighbor can only be held liable for intentionally injuring her or for gross
misconduct.
c.
It may depend on Kelley’s age.
d.
Yes, the neighbor is strictly liable.
30. Kyle was eating clam chowder soup in a restaurant when a very small piece of bone lodged in his throat. Fortunately,
he was able to remove the bone with his fingers. However, he was upset by the incident and sued the restaurant for
negligence. What is the most likely result in this case?
a.
Kyle will not collect any damages since he did not sustain any damages.
b.
Kyle will collect damages because the restaurant committed negligence per se.
c.
Kyle will collect damages if he proves it was possible to prevent tiny fish bones from being present in clam
chowder.
d.
Kyle will collect damages, as res ipsa loquitur applies.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Evaluation
31. Phillip was waiting for a bus at a bus stop. Across the street and down the block, a mechanic negligently overinflated a
tire he was intending to put onto Marsha’s pickup truck. The exploding tire injured Marsha and frightened a neighborhood
dog, which ran down the street and knocked Phillip down, injuring his knee. Phillip sued the mechanic. In applying the
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. decision to this case, Phillip would
a.
win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire, which led to Phillip’s injury.
b.
win based on negligence per se.
c.
lose because the court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
d.
lose because, although the mechanic’s conduct was negligent toward Marsha, it was not a wrong in relation to
Phillip, who was far away. The mechanic could not have foreseen injury to Phillip and therefore had no duty
to him.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Evaluation
32. In a comparative negligence state, if the plaintiff in a negligence lawsuit is found to be 30 percent negligent, the
plaintiff would recover
a.
70 percent of the damages.
b.
all of the damages.
c.
none of the damages.
d.
30 percent of the damages.
Easy
Moderate
Bloom’s: Evaluation
33. As it applies to landowners, which of the following statements regarding liability to a licensee is correct?
a.
Whether or not the landowner is responsible for injury depends on whether the licensee is an adult or a child.
b.
The landowner is liable to a licensee for injuries caused by hidden dangers only.
c.
Since the licensee is a trespasser on the landowner’s property, the landowner is not responsible for injury.
d.
Since a licensee has permission to be on the landowner’s property, the landowner is responsible for all injury
whether hidden or obvious.
Bloom’s: Comprehension
34. A customer in a restaurant would be considered ________ to whom the restaurant owner owes a duty ________.
a.
a licensee; to warn of known dangers.
b.
an invitee; of reasonable care.
c.
a social guest; only to avoid intentionally injuring him.
d.
a licensee; of strict liability
Bloom’s: Comprehension
35. Tommie, a six-year-old child, was seriously injured when he stuck a fork into an electrical outlet at a restaurant. His
parents sued the restaurant where the incident occurred, claiming it should have had child protective guards on the outlets
even though no law required the restaurant to do so. Whether the restaurant is liable will be dependent upon whether
a.
the incident was reasonably foreseeable.
b.
the court views Tommie as a licensee or a trespassing child.
c.
this is negligence per se.
d.
this is an ultrahazardous activity.
Bloom’s: Application
36. A branch of tort law that imposes a much higher level of liability when harm results from ultrahazardous acts or
defective products is referred to as
a.
res ipsa loquitur.
b.
strict liability.
c.
heightened liability.
d.
strict negligence.
Bloom’s: Knowledge
37. The notion that if a plaintiff is even slightly negligent, he or she recovers nothing is known as
Bloom’s: Knowledge
a.
comparative negligence.
b.
reasonable negligence.
c.
contributory negligence.
d.
insignificant negligence.
38. The test of “foreseeability” is generally used to determine the existence of which element of a negligence case?
a.
Duty of due care
b.
Breach
c.
Factual cause
d.
negligence per se
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
39. Don was driving his truck when a board fell out of the truck bed and onto the road. Alice, who was driving closely
behind Don’s truck, tried to avoid the board, swerved and struck a telephone pole, causing her severe injuries. Which of
the following is correct?
a.
Don is strictly liable to Alice for her injuries.
b.
In a comparative negligence state, the actions of Don and Alice will be weighed to determine liability.
c.
Don was not negligent in allowing the board to fall out of his truck.
d.
Don is engaging in ultrahazardous activity.
Moderate
Bloom’s: Evaluation
40. What level of owner’s liability does a trespassing adult have?
a.
lowest level
b.
mid level
c.
higher level
d.
highest level
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
41. Discuss the concepts of contributory negligence and comparative negligence.
Easy
Bloom’s: Knowledge
42. List and discuss the elements necessary to establish negligence.
43. Mavrex, Inc. received an application from Larry and, since his written qualifications seemed to meet a pressing
current need, they hired him without checking his references or prior records. Actually, Larry had been in prison for
murder several years earlier. Tom, a long-time Mavrex employee, angered Larry when Tom tried to tell Larry how to do
his job. Larry attacked and injured Tom. If Tom sues Mavrex, what would his cause of action be, and what elements
would Tom need to prove to win his case?
44. A contractor used dynamite to loosen a rocky hillside. The blast from the dynamite caused a house foundation to
crack. The house was located over a half-mile away from the dynamite site. The contractor was careful when using the
dynamite and no allegation of negligence is made. However, the house owner claims the contractor is liable for damage to
the foundation. Is the house owner correct? Explain.
45. On Monday, Travis took his four-wheeler to Reppart’s Equipment & Service for repair because the steering was not
working properly. On Friday he called Reppart’s to see if his four-wheeler was ready because he wanted it for a weekend
trip. Reppart’s said they had done the major repairs but that the steering system still needed some work and they needed
another few days to finish the repairs. Travis told them he would pick the four-wheeler up and use it for the weekend and
then bring it back to have them finish their work. While riding with friends on the weekend, Travis ran into someone
because the steering stuck and he couldn’t swerve to avoid them. Discuss how a court would determine causation in a
negligence suit against Travis.