Holding everything else constant, government approval of horizontal mergers is more likely to be
granted if the “market” that firms are in is broadly defined rather than narrowly defined.
If a monopolist‘s marginal revenue is $15 a unit and its marginal cost is $25, then to maximize
profit the firm should decrease output.
A monopolist currently sells 18 units of a good. If marginal revenue on the last unit sold is $117
then the price of the good must be less than $117.
The market demand curve facing a monopolist is more elastic than the market demand curve
facing a monopolistic competitor.
If a monopolist‘s price is $50 at the output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost and
average total cost is $43 then the average profit is $7.
Unlike a perfect competitor, a monopolist faces the market demand curve.
If a per–unit tax on output sold is imposed on a monopoly’s product, the monopolist will increase
its market price by the full amount of the tax.
A product’s price approaches its marginal cost as market concentration increases.
The U.S. government would never approve a proposed merger between two firms that could
significantly increase the newly merged firm‘s market power even if the efficiency gains from the
newly merged firm could make consumers better off.
In reality because few markets are perfectly competitive, some loss of economic efficiency occurs in
the market for nearly every good or service.