27. According to the Supreme Court, show-ups are:
a. so suggestive that they are always unconstitutional.
b. permissible if they do not result in a very substantial likelihood of misidentification.
c. unconstitutional if the police could have reasonably been able to set up a lineup instead.
d. are permissible only if defense counsel is present when they are conducted.
28. According to the Supreme Court opinion in Manson v. Braithwaite (1977), involving identifying a man from a
single photograph whom the identifier had seen only once in poor light for several minutes:
a. such evidence must always be excluded if it is suggestive.
b. reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony.
c. photographic identification procedures are per se unconstitutional.
d. no identification based on a single photograph is ever reliable.
29. WhichofthefollowingisNOToneofthefivefactorsinthe“totalityofcircumstances”thatshouldweighheavilyin
determining whether the lineup or show-up procedure created a likelihood of misidentification?
a. Witness level of certainty when identifying the suspects during the ID procedure.
b. Witness degree of attention at the time of the crime.
c. Witness age at the time of the crime.
d. Witness opportunity to observe.
30. In Manson v. Braithwaite (1977), for determining the admissibility of witness identification, the majority of the
Supreme Court endorsed what became known as the:
a. per se approach.
b. blind administration test.
c. the totality of the circumstances approach.
d. the better use approach.
Chapter 09: IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES
IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES