23. Relying on the plain view doctrine, the Minnesota v. Dickerson ruling stated that officers could seize non-threatening
contraband, such as drugs, if its identity as contraband is immediately apparent to the sense of touch. What is this
exception more commonly known as?
one-motion grasp exception.
Detentions of Containers and Other Property
Bloom’s: Understand
24. Based on the totality of circumstances, which of the following factors is not generally considered in an inquiry
determining whether or not a “seizure” has occurred?
whether the officer displayed a weapon
the number of officers involved
whether the officer involved was undercover or in uniform
the language used and the tone of voice of the officer during the interaction
Specific Circumstances Justifying Stops and Frisks
25. An officer observes an individual leaving a place the officer believes to be a drug house. As the officer approaches,
the man makes furtive gestures, reacts nervously, and changes course quickly before the officer yells out for the man to
stop. The man stops. The man is carrying a locked case. Given this scenario, select the true statement.
The officer is justified to immediately pry open the case and search it.
The officer is justified to temporarily detain the man and case and have the case sniffed by a drug canine.
The officer cannot temporarily detain the person, but is justified in detaining the case.
The officer has probable cause and is justified to place the man under arrest.
Specific Circumstances Justifying Stops and Frisks
Bloom’s: Apply
26. In the case of United States v. Place, the courts ruled that seizure of a suspect’s luggage suspected of containing drugs
for approximately _____ in order to transport the luggage to another airport for a canine sniff was excessive.
Detentions of Containers and Other Property