1. The Fourth Amendment:
a. applies only to criminal cases.
b. protects just those in criminal cases.
c. limits the right to search to the gathering and use of evidence in criminal cases.
d. includes searches which go beyond the needs of criminal law enforcement.
2. Which of the following is NOT considered a special-needs search?
a. Inventory search
b. Prenatal patient drug search
c. Hot pursuit search
d. Airport search
3. According to U.S. v. Ramsey (1977), searches at international borders are:
a. reasonable even without a warrant or probable cause.
b. reasonable only with a warrant.
c. reasonable without a warrant, if there is probable cause.
d. require probable cause, followed by a warrant.
4. Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding (2009) held that:
a. partially strip-searching an eighth grader was reasonable.
b. partially strip-searching an eighth grader was unreasonable, but granted individual school officials qualified
immunity from civil liability for the illegal search.
c. partially strip-searching an eighth grade was unreasonable, and school officials maintained civil liability for
the illegal search.
d. partially strip-searching an eighth grader was reasonable, but school officials could be held civilly liable for
the search.
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
5. In order to meet constitutional standards, an inventory search must:
a. be conducted only at police impound lots.
b. be done pursuant to written, established, police department procedures.
c. leave no room for police officer discretion in the search.
d. involveonlya“plainview”searchoftheinteriorandexterioroftheitembeingsearched.
6. In South Dakota v. Opperman (1976), the police conducted an inventory search in which they searched
Opperman’scaraftertowingittoanimpoundlotbecauseitwasparkedillegally.Theyfoundmarijuanaduringa
search of the glove compartment. The Supreme Court decided that the search of the glove comparment:
a. violated the U.S. Constitution.
b. did not violate the U.S. Constitution because it was a legitimate inventory search.
c. violatedtheU.S.ConstitutionbecauseitwasconductedonasuspicionthatdrugswereinOpperman’s
glove compartment.
d. did not violate the U.S. Constitution because drugs were discovered in the glove compartment.
7. According to the Supreme Court, in order to conduct a routine search at the border, officers need:
a. probable cause.
b. a warrant.
c. reasonable suspicion.
d. no probable cause, reasonable suspicion, or a warrant.
8. Joan Smith is entering the United States at the Canadian border. Officers have reasonable suspicion to believe she
is smuggling drugs. Which of the following searches of Joan may the officers lawfully conduct?
a. Routine border search, a strip search of her person, a search of her handbag, and a body cavity search.
b. Only a routine border search and a search of her handbag.
c. Routine border search, a strip search of her person, and a search of her handbag.
d. Only a routine border search.
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
9. A(n) _______________ search involves searching prisoners, probationers, parolees, and visitors and employees
of prisons and jails to control contraband.
a. inventory
b. custody-related
c. border
d. inspection
10. With regard to border searches, the U.S. Supreme Court has found that:
a. any kind of border search can be made without any justification whatsoever.
b. strip searches must be justified by probable cause.
c. body cavity searches are never justified.
d. thenationalinterestincontrollingthenation’sbordersoutweighstheinvasionofprivacycausedbyroutine
border searches.
11. In determining the reasonableness of airport searches, courts have:
a. not ruled on this matter.
b. held they entail minimal intrusions that apply to all passengers.
c. considered them to be private searches.
d. held that airports may conduct such searches to protect public safety, but the fruits of the searches are
inadmissible at a criminal trial.
12. A special need that justifies airport searches is:
a. protection of endangered species.
b. protection of public health.
c. protection from drug smuggling.
d. protection for air travelers.
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
13. Jail detainees, not yet convicted of a crime:
a. cannot be searched until they are convicted.
b. have the same Fourth Amendment protections as people not charged with a crime because they presumed
innocent until proven guilty.
c. have the diminished Fourth Amendment rights and can be searched without probable cause.
d. can be searched only if there is reasonable suspicion they are dangerous.
14. Historically, before the second half of the Twentieth Century, U.S. prisoners:
a. had almost no rights under the Constitution.
b. have always been fully protected by the Constitution.
c. have been protected by the Constitution if they plead guilty.
d. have been protected by the Fourth Amendment in the privacy of their cells.
15. International border searches are based on a compelling interest held by the U.S. government to maintain security.
Which of the following statements accurately describes this issue?
a. International border searches are based on a compelling interest held by the U.S. government to maintain
security. Which of the following statements accurately describes this issue?.
b. Border searches do not apply to Americans returning to the U.S. from vacation.
c. Stemming the flow of drugs into the U.S. is one rationale for border searches without reasonable suspicion.
d. Border stops are always unconstitutional if they involve vehicle searches.
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
16. Frank is an inmate at Greensburg State Prison and he has just had a contact visit with an old friend. Before Frank
returns to his cell, prison guards subject Frank to a strip search. Such a search is:
a. constitutional, because prisoners have a diminished expectation of privacy and
there is an important government need to maintain prison security.
b. constitutional, because prisoners forfeit all Fourth Amendment rights.
c. unconstitutional, unless prison officials have reasonable suspicion to think they
will find contraband or evidence of a crime on Frank.
d. unconstitutional, unless prison officials have probable cause to think they will
find contraband or evidence of a crime on Frank.
17. Withregardtoaprisoner’sexpectationofprivacy,thecourthasruledthatprisonershave:
a. rights to privacy equal to a free man.
b. absolutely no rights to privacy whatsoever.
c. a substantially reduced expectation of privacy.
d. only those rights that are given at the discretion of the prison administration.
18. According to the court in Bull v. City and County of San Francisco (2010), involving strip searches of all
arrested persons who were admitted to the general population at the San Francisco jail:
a. the strip searches did not violate the Fourth Amendment.
b. the reasonableness of strip searches requires probable cause that detainees are concealing weapons or
contraband.
c. strip searches can be conducted only if there is individualized reasonable suspicion.
d. correctional officers must contact law enforcement for a warrant before a strip search can be conducted.
19. Which of the following is TRUE regarding probationers and parolees?
a. Both groups have the same Fourth Amendment rights as ordinary citizens.
b. Parolees can be searched without either probable cause or warrants.
c. Probationers can be searched without warrants but not without probable cause.
d. The Fourth Amendment rights of probationers and parolees has not been addressed by the courts.
20. In ____________ the court held that students may be searched at schools based on reasonable suspicion rather
than probable cause (due to the schools need to maintain a healthy learning environment).
a. Vernonia School District v. Acton
b. Board of Education v. Earls
c. New Jersey v. T.L.O
d. Commonwealth v. Nielson
21. The need for prison and jail security permits searches without probable cause or a warrant of:
a. prisoners and pretrial detainees.
b. prisoners, pretrial detainees, and visitors to the prison.
c. only prisoners.
d. prisoners, pretrial detainees, employees of the prison, and visitors to the prison.
22. The Supreme Court in Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), involving state hospital obstetric patients who
were pregnant and arrested for child abuse after testing positive for cocaine, decided that the:
a. warrantless, suspicionless, and nonconsensual searches violated the Fourth Amendment.
b. searches do not violate the Fourth Amendment because the incidence of cocaine use among pregnant
women has created a special need.
c. searches do not violate the Fourth Amendment if doctors suspect the mother is using cocaine.
d. searches violate the Fourth Amendment because they are conducted by health care professionals and not
law enforcement.
23. Which of the following is TRUE?
a. Every state and the federal government now have statutes that mandate DNA testing of all incarcerated
felons.
b. Every state and the federal government now have statutes that mandate DNA testing of all those
incarcerated of either a felony or a misdemeanor.
c. DNA testing of those incarcerated is on a state-by-state basis, and there is no statute at either the federal or
state’slevel.
d. Only the federal government has a statute mandating DNA testing for incarcerated felons.
24. To do a body cavity search at an international border, which of the below is needed?
a. Probable cause
b. Reasonable suspicion
c. Individualized suspicion
d. A written set of procedures
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
25. In Samson v. California (2006), the Supreme Court ruled that:
a. a police officer is prohibited from conducting a suspicionless search of a parolee.
b. a police officer is not prohibited from conducting a suspicionless search of a parolee.
c. a police officer can conduct a suspicionless search of a parolee if the parolee is searched in a public place.
d. a police officer must have reasonable suspicion in order to search a parolee.
26. DNA testing of incarcerated felons:
a. has been declared unconstitutional by the courts that have considered it.
b. has been found to be constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.
c. has been found to be constitutional by the courts of appeal that have considered it.
d. has not yet been addressed in any court opinions.
27. According to the Supreme Court’s decision in New Jersey v. T.L.O., involving the search of a student’s purse,
school officials (at least those officials supervising students junior high age or younger) may search the possessions
of a student under their authority:
a. only with a search warrant.
b. based on probable cause that the student has broken the law or a school regulation.
c. based on reasonable suspicion alone.
d. without a warrant at any time, for any reason, and without individualized suspicion.
28. In regard to school searches, the Supreme Court has declared:
a. school officials may conduct a search of the outer clothing of all persons found on school property.
b. while in school, children have no reasonable expectation of privacy.
c. the legality of the search of a student should depend on the reasonableness, under all circumstances, of the
search.
d. the Fourth Amendment does not protect university students in administrative searches.
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
29. What did the court rule regarding the reasonableness of drug testing?
a. Drug testing is reasonable only when one has given consent, and not under and other circumstances.
b. Drug testing is reasonable because of the random nature of testing and the special need of the government
to protect public safety, which outweighs the minimal invasion of privacy.
c. Drug testing is no longer allowed and is a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment.
d. Drug testing is only allowed in those circumstances where the employee consents to submit to the specific
tests of his/her urine, not of a random sampling of all employees.
30. According to State v. Ellis, searches of college dormitory rooms:
a. are not protected by the Fourth Amendment.
b. by university officials require reasonable suspicion.
c. are governed by the same standards for searches of elementary and high school students.
d. do not require a warrant or probable cause when conducted by university residence hall staff officials for
health and safety reasons.
31. The special need used to justify employee drug testing is directed mainly at:
a. employees who may endanger public safety while under the influence of illegal drugs.
b. employees who may be smuggling and/or selling illegal drugs while employed.
c. preventative government civil liability.
d. criminal law enforcement in general.
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
32. The court considered all of the following in Board of Education v Earls (2002) except:
a. the ramifications of a failed UA on the student (for example, legal sanctions, academic discipline).
b. the type of extra-curricular activity the tested students wanted to engage in.
c. thenatureoftheschool’s/government’sconcernsandtheeffectivenessofthedrugtestingpolicyin
addressing those concerns.
d. the character of the intrusion on privacy imposed by the testing policy.
33. A batch of letter sized airmail envelopes from a county well known as a source of narcotics, that were bulky and
much heavier than ordinary airmail letters, are stopped at the Post Office in New York. A U.S. Customs
Inspector opens the letters and finds heroin. No search warrant was sought. Would this be considered an illegal
search and seizure?
a. Yes, because there was no probable cause to link the envelopes to any specific crime; smuggling or not.
b. No, because it constitutes a “border search” and anything crossing the border falls within this exception.
c. No, but only because “probable cause” was not articulated nor was a search warrant obtained.
d. No, it would only be admissible with a warrant or with consent, regardless of the border issue, since it
involved the U.S. Mail.
34. As per the decision in U.S. v. Knights (2001), search abilities were expanded to include _________ officers
who might be required to conduct a search.
a. probation
b. parole
c. police
d. corrections
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
35. The Supreme Court ruled in Vernonia v. School District of Acton (1995):
a. drug testing of students participating in athletic programs violates the Fourth Amendment.
b. drug testing of student athletes must be consensual in order to comply with the Fourth Amendment.
c. random, suspicionless drug testing of student athletes does not violate the Fourth Amendment.
d. the Fourth Amendment does not apply to drug testing of students.
36. The right against unreasonable searches and seizures is limited to criminal suspects.
a. True
b. False
37. TheSupremeCourthasnotappliedtheFourthAmendmentto“specialneeds”thataren’tdirectlyrelatedto
criminal law enforcement.
a. True
b. False
38. The objective basis for inventory searches consists of following routine procedures in compiling the inventory.
a. True
b. False
39. The Supreme Court has ruled that inventory searches are not Fourth Amendment searches.
a. True
b. False
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
40. The need to protect police from possible danger is not a justification for inventory searches.
a. True
b. False
41. The special need justifying routine border searches is the right to control who and what comes in and leaves the
country.
a. True
b. False
42. The border search exception allows searches at international borders without warrants or probable cause.
a. True
b. False
43. According to the Supreme Court, it is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment for public schools to require
students involved in any extracurricular activity to be tested for drug use.
a. True
b. False
44. Probationers and parolees have diminished Fourth Amendment rights.
a. True
b. False
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
45. The border search exception does not allow the warrantless opening of mail coming into the country.
a. True
b. False
46. According to the court in State v. Ellis, involving a search of a dormitory room at a public university,
administratorsmayneverenterstudents’roomsforanypurposewithoutprobablecause.
a. True
b. False
47. The Supreme Court has not addressed the extent to which the Fourth Amendment protects university students in
their dorm rooms.
a. True
b. False
48. Urine testing of government employees for the presence of drugs is a search under the Fourth Amendment.
a. True
b. False
49. Criminal law enforcement is not the purpose of employee drug testing.
a. True
b. False
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
50. Special-needs searches can never result in prosecution and conviction.
a. True
b. False
51. Government inspections and other searches not conducted to gather criminal evidence are known as
______________ searches.
52. Searches that consist of compiling lists of property in government custody are ______________ searches.
53. Searches of persons and property at the border of the United States to control who and what comes in and goes
out are know as _______________ searches.
54. The objective standard necessary to justify a strip search at the border is _____________ _____________.
55. Body cavity searches at the border are reasonable only if authorities have ____________ _____________.
56. The requirement that law enforcement officers follow written, departmental procedures when conducting inventory
searches is called the __________________ _______________ ______________.
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
57. The principle by which the government stands in the place of parents is _________ __________
____________.
58. Routine, unannounced cell searches for weapons and contraband are called _____________ searches.
59. Searches at international borders are reasonable even without warrants or probable cause under what is called the
_____________ __________ ___________.
60. The safety and security of travelers are the special needs that justify ___________ searches.
61. Why are inventory searches reasonable even without a warrant or probable cause? Identify the special needs
satisfied by inventory searches, and what substitutes for probable cause as the objective basis for an inventory
search?
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
62. Identify four characteristics all special-needs searches have in common.
63. Identifythespecialneedforsearchesofprisonersanddiscussprisoners’expectationofprivacy.
64. Whydon’tsearchesofprobationersandparoleesrequirewarrantsorprobablecausetobereasonable?
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
65. Why are searches of high school students reasonable without warrants or probable cause?
Chapter 07: “SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES
“SPECIAL NEEDS” SEARCHES