b. hire the woman; the firm will be happy that you’ve improved diversity
c. have both candidates meet with your team, each one separately, and get their
input on the candidates; then decide based on their preference
d. have both candidates meet with your team, each one separately, and get their
input on the candidates; then make the decision on your own, objectively
18. Your firm has been repeatedly accused of discrimination, and your boss, knowing that
you just graduated from college with a degree in Management, and a certificate in Human
Resources Management, has asked you to review the company’s practices and procedures
with regard to hiring and promotion, and eliminate those that could lead to iscrimination.
Which of the following practices would likely lead to discrimination?
a. evaluating candidates based upon technical skills (30%) and interviews (70%)
b. having the interviewers meet as a group to “coordinate” their interview scores
c. weighting the answers to some questions over others
d. all of these would likely lead to discrimination
e. none of these would likely lead to discrimination
19. With regard to the situation in Question 18, above, which of the following practices
would you recommend to help avoid discrimination, and what is the basis for your
recommendation?
a. change the weight given to the evaluation of candidates to rely more heavily on
technical skills than on the interview, because this would make the assessment
more objective
b. do not allow the interviewers to change their scores developed during the
interview, as this will remove score manipulation
c. continue to weight the answers to those questions which are more important,
because this is necessary to acquiring compatible workers, and does not
discriminate
d. all of these would help avoid discrimination
e. only a and b would help avoid discrimination
20. Your firm has been wanting to hire another engineer for some time, and your supervisor
has just made an offer to someone from out of state. The hiree is in the process of selling
his house, and moving his family to your city. But you are well aware that the economic
downturn has sharply curtailed business, and you don’t see how the current level of
business can support another engineer. In fact, you are all a little concerned about layoffs.
You know that your supervisor also knows all of this, but he has told you that he won’t
withdraw the offer until he absolutely has to. By that time, the hiree may well have sold
his home and moved his family, but have no new job with your firm. If the offer is
withdrawn under these circumstances, and the hiree sues, which causes of action, if any,
might be successful?
a. breach of contract and promissory estoppel
b. promissory estoppel and fraud