4) Suppose that it would cost a firm $10 million to develop a new drug. In the absence of a
patent, other firms will be able to copy and bring to market a generic equivalent of the drug in
three years. In each of these three years, the firm would earn monopoly profits of $3 million. A
patent will generate monopoly status for the firm for twenty years. If the government knew this
information ahead of time, which of the following is most correct?
A) The government should not grant a patent to the firm, because the firm would earn monopoly
profits for three years even without the patent.
B) The government should not grant a patent to the firm, because monopoly leads to efficiency
losses relative to the competitive market.
C) The government should grant a patent to the firm, because even with a patent the firm will not
earn a monopoly profits.
D) The government should grant a patent to the firm, because the firm would not produce the
drug at all without a patent.
5) Suppose that it would cost a firm $9 million to develop a new drug. In the absence of a patent,
other firms will be able to copy and bring to market a generic equivalent of the drug in three
years. In each of these three years, the firm would earn monopoly profits of $4 million. A patent
will generate monopoly status for the firm for twenty years. If the government knew this
information ahead of time, which of the following is most correct?
A) The government should grant a patent to the firm, because the firm would not produce the
drug at all without a patent.
B) The government should grant a patent to the firm, because it does not have the resources to
determine on a case-by-case basis exactly which inventions merit award of the patent.
C) The government should grant a patent to the firm, because even with a patent the firm will not
earn a monopoly profits.
D) The government should not grant a patent to the firm, because the firm would earn sufficient
profits to develop the drug without the patent.