CHAPTER 6: SHORT-TERM SEXUAL STRATEGIES
Chapter Summary
The scientific study of mating over the course of the twentieth century has focused nearly exclusively on
marriage. Human anatomy, physiology, and psychology, however, betray an ancestral past filled with
affairs and short-term mating. The obvious reproductive advantages of short-term mating to men may
have blinded scientists to their benefits to women.
In this chapter, we first considered men’s short–term mating. According to Trivers’s theory of parental
investment and sexual selection, the reproductive benefits to ancestral men as a consequence of short-
term mating would have been direct—an increase in the number of children produced as a function of the
number of women successfully inseminated. The empirical evidence is strong that men do have a greater
desire for short-term mating than do women. Compared to women, men express a greater desire for a
variety of sex partners, let less time elapse before seeking sexual intercourse, lower their standards
dramatically when pursuing short-term mating, have more sexual fantasies and more fantasies involving a
variety of sex partners, report having a higher sex drive, find cues to sexual exploitability to be attractive
for short-term mating, experience more sexual regret over missed sexual opportunities, have a larger
number of extramarital affairs, are more likely to seek hook-ups and friends with benefits, and visit
prostitutes more often. Although a few psychologists continue to deny these fundamental sex differences
(e.g., Miller & Fishkin, 1997), the difference between men and women in the desire for sexual variety is
one of the largest, most replicable, and most cross-culturally robust psychological sex differences ever
documented (Schmitt et al., 2003; Petersen & Hyde, 2010).
There are potentially five classes of adaptive benefits to women: economic or material resources, genetic
benefits, mate switching benefits, short-term for long-term goals, and mate manipulation benefits. Based
on the studies that have been conducted, the empirical evidence supports the hypothesized functions of
mate switching, resource acquisition, short-term for long-term mating goals, and access to good genes or
sexy son genes, and does not at all support status enhancement or mate manipulation benefits. Individuals
differ in whether they tend to pursue short-term or long-term mating strategies. Interestingly, these
individual differences can be detected, at least partially. Women with a short-term mating inclination
show more eyebrow flashes and glances when interacting with men; dress more provocatively at
ovulation; are perceived to be somewhat masculine in appearance, and are attracted to men who have
especially masculine
faces and bodies. Men who prioritize short-term mating tune their attention to attractive women more than
their long-term oriented peers, and also show a stronger preference for women with a low WHR—a well-
established cue to fertility.
The final section of this chapter examined various context effects on short-term mating. Sex ratio is one
context—a surplus of women tends to promote short-term mating in both sexes. Another important
context is mate value, one’s desirability to members of the opposite sex. Men high in mate value, as