81) Ruggers is a maker of a range of highly popular cruise motorcycles. Tim buys a Ruggers
motorcycle from a dealership and suffers an accident. While recuperating from his injuries, he
learns that Ruggers has recalled all motorcycles it had manufactured and sold in the previous two
years, owing to a previously unknown defect in their braking systems. Tim brings a product
liability lawsuit against the motorcycle manufacturer and claims $50,000 in damages. The defect
in the motorcycle is found to be half responsible for the accident, while Tim’s own negligence of
traffic rules contributed to the rest. Under the doctrine of contributory negligence, what would be
the ruling of the court hearing this case?
A) Tim cannot recover any damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
B) Tim can recover $25,000 worth of damages from the Ruggers and the rest from the dealership
from which he purchased the motorcycle.
C) Tim can recover $50,000 worth of damages plus any punitive damages that may be awarded
by the jury.
D) Tim can recover $50,000 worth of damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
82) ________ is a tort doctrine that makes manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and
others in the chain of distribution of a defective product liable for the damages caused by the
defect, irrespective of fault.
A) Absolute liability
B) Contingent liability
C) Superior responsibility
D) Strict liability
83) Henry is undergoing a surgery at Sacred Heart Hospital to insert an artificial pacemaker that
will keep his heartbeat regular. The pacemaker is manufactured by Benford, Inc. In this case, Dr.
DeBenedetto, the surgeon, is considered as the dominant element. Supposing that the pacemaker
fails to function as expected after the surgery, who would be strictly liable for its failure?
A) Benford, Inc
B) Dr. DeBenedetto
C) Henry
D) Sacred Heart Hospital