4) Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone examined the impact of reductions in air pollution
since the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970. Which of the following statements summarizes
their findings?
A) The marginal benefit of reductions in air pollution was less than the marginal cost.
B) The marginal cost of reducing emissions of sulfur dioxide has increased over time as the
marginal benefit of the reductions has increased.
C) The benefits of reducing the six main air pollutants in the two years following the Act greatly
exceeded the costs.
D) In the two years following passage of the Act, fewer infants died than would have died if the
Act had not been passed.
5) If electric utilities continually reduce their emissions of sulfur dioxide,
A) the utilities will eventually be forced to go out of business.
B) the marginal benefit of additional emissions will rise.
C) the marginal cost of further emissions will rise.
D) the total benefit of sulfur dioxide emissions will fall.
6) If the marginal benefit of reducing emissions of some air pollutant is greater than the marginal
cost,
A) further reductions will make society better off.
B) the marginal benefit will rise and the marginal cost will fall as further reductions are made.
C) economic efficiency will be achieved when emissions are reduced to zero.
D) private businesses, rather the consumers, should be made to pay for the cost of further
reductions.