29. In the study involving periwinkle snails and their algal food sources, which conclusion can be drawn?
Periwinkles eliminated all algae and died out.
Periwinkles eliminated all of the less dominant algae species.
Periwinkles eliminated the dominant algae entirely.
Periwinkles had no effect on the algae populations.
Periwinkles can increase or decrease species richness depending on which algal species it
is consuming.
30. In a study examining the growth of coral in a portion of the Great Barrier Reef, which conclusion
concerning alterations in the coral colonies is the most accurate?
Changes in the colony are due to external factors only.
Changes in the colony are due to internal factors only.
Changes in the colony are due to both external and internal factors.
Changes in the colony are solely due to man’s interference.
The study was not able to observe any changes in the coral colony over time.
31. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis posits which of the following?
Species richness is greatest in communities that experience infrequent moderate
disturbances.
Species richness is greatest in communities that experience high temperatures.
Species richness is greatest in communities that experience frequent severe disturbances.
Species richness is greatest in communities that experience frequent moderate
disturbances.
Species richness is greatest in communities that experience intense disturbances.
32. The relationship between species richness and recovery from natural disturbances can best be
summarized as follows:
communities with more diversity do not recover from natural disturbances.
communities with more diversity experience more natural disturbances.
communities with more diversity recover less rapidly from natural disturbances.
communities with more diversity recover more rapidly from natural disturbances.
there is no correlation between community diversity and recovery from natural
disturbances.