Kanovitz: Manual site for Constitutional Law, 13th Edition
Chapter 05: Laws Governing Police Surveillance
Multiple Choice
1. In this decision, the Supreme Court overruled Olmstead v. United States:
a. Terry v. Ohio
b. Payton v. United States
c. Hoffa v. United States
d. Katz v. United States
2. The Hoffa doctrine asserts the following:
a. a wiretap order is required in order to tap a phone line
b. police are not authorized to use x-ray equipment in all locations
c. people are not protected when they wrongly believe that voluntarily disclosed
information will not be revealed
d. a warrant is needed for a “sniff test”
3. Video surveillance that produces a soundtrack requires:
a. compliance with the Fourth Amendment
b. compliance with FISA
c. compliance with the Wiretap Act
d. both a & c
4. The Wiretap Act protects the following type of communications:
a. oral communications that are uttered with the expectation of privacy under
circumstances justifying that expectation
b. tone only paging devices
c. overhearing cell phone conversations conducted in public
d. all of the above
5. All of the following are procedural requirements for a wiretap order except for:
a. proof that traditional investigative techniques have been tried and failed
b. limits the duration of a wiretap to fifteen days
c. approval from a high-ranking official within the Justice Department
d. probable cause for a serious crime such as espionage, kidnapping, or murder
6. A wiretap order is a specialized form of a:
a. search warrant
b. arrest warrant