114. Bailey’s Brake Service, a bit of an eyesore at a main intersection near the faltering downtown area of Mesa,
Arizona, was a family-founded, owned and operated business that had been open in its existing location since 1970.
Lenhardt’s True Value Hardware store was also a longstanding Mesa business with a location south and east of
Bailey’s and a desire for a better location as well as a professed desire to revitalize Mesa’s downtown area. The
Lenhardts had purchased the property abutting Bailey’s but felt that the street-facing Bailey’s property was
necessary for its location, location, location.
The city fathers and mothers were in favor of condemnation of the Bailey use, a taking by eminent domain,
followed by a “reissuing” of the once Bailey property to Lenhardt’s for its construction of a new and much less
eyesoreish retail establishment on the site:
Randy Bailey challenged the taking of his business as unconstitutional. Discuss the issues in his case and challenge
to the city’s taking by eminent domain.
115. A federal statute makes it a felony to engage in any commercial act involving the “cruelty, wounding, or killing” of
an animal or depicting anything being to an animal that is prohibited by law. Robert Stevens ran a website that sold
films of dog fighting, many of which were films done in Japan where such activity is not illegal. He was convicted
of violating the federal statute. Stevens appealed his case on the grounds that his First Amendment rights were
violated because the statute was overly broad. What theory of constitutional law would Stevens be using in his
appeal?
a. Procedural due process
b. The Commerce Clause
c. Substantive due process
d. The Fifth Amendment