43. In the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case, the Supreme Court held that
a. affirmative action programs were allowable in business schools but not in law schools.
b. race cannot be the only factor in an admissions decision.
c. affirmative action was ruled unconstitutional.
d. race cannot be considered as a factor in making admissions decisions.
e. quotas are legal.
44. TheSupremeCourt’sopinioninAdarandConstructors,Inc.v.Peña means that once an affirmative action
program has succeeded in achieving the purpose it was tailored to meet, the program
a. must be changed or dropped.
b. should continue unchanged.
c. should be extended to other minority groups.
d. should be phased out over 18 months.
e. must be subjected to unannounced audits.
45. In 2003, the United States Supreme Court considered two different admissions polices adopted at the University of
Michigan and
a. for the first time, ruled that affirmative action was unconstitutional.
b. ruledthat“diversity”couldnotbeacompellinggovernmentinterest.
c. approved affirmative action plans that took race into consideration as part of a complete examination of the
applicant’sbackground.
d. approved a plan that automatically awarded a substantial number of points to applicants based on minority
status.
e. ruled that the time had come for all affirmative action programs to end, since government could do nothing
more to alleviate the effects of past discrimination.
Name: Class: Date:
Chapter_5_Civil_Rights