with other women, and particularly if other women are physically attractive and seem interested in them.
Women who are higher in objectively assessed and self-perceived attractiveness raise their mating
standards and seek men who are relatively more masculine, symmetrical, high in status, attractive,
healthy, and physically fit.
For preferences to evolve, they must have had a recurrent impact on actual mating behavior. We do not
expect that women’s preferences will show a one–to-one correspondence with behavior. People cannot
always get what they want. Nonetheless, several lines of research support the notion that women’s
preferences do in fact affect actual mating behavior. Women respond more to personal ads in which men
indicate good financial status. Men high in status and resources are more likely to marry. If living in a
polygynous society, high-status men are more likely to attract multiple wives. Poor men are more likely
to remain bachelors. Women who embody what men desire (e.g., by being physically attractive) are in the
Suggested Readings
Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
Dunn, M. J., Brinton, S., & Clark, L. (2010). Universal sex differences in online advertisers age
preferences: Comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evolution and Human
Behavior, 31, 383–392.
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness:
Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251–267.
Li, N. P., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K. M., Jonason, P. K., Pasisz, D. J., & Aumer, K. (2009). An
evolutionary perspective on humor: Sexual selection or interest indication? Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 923–936.
Lieberman, D. (2009). Rethinking the Taiwanese minor marriage data: Evidence the mind uses multiple
kinship cues to regulate inbreeding avoidance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 153–160.
Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2013). Environmentally contingent preferences: