60. The philosophy of justice that asserts that those who violate the rights of others deserve to be punished is known
as:
a. specific deterrence. b. just deserts.
c. revenge. d. retribution.
61. According to Von Hirsch’s view on “just desserts,” why is punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation
wrong?
a. Punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation does not allow for the possibility of rehabilitation.
b. Punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation is used only within the adult criminal justice system,
thus, it ignores juvenile offenders.
c. Punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation involves an offender’s future actions.
d. Von Hirsch did not view punishment based on deterrence or incapacitation as wrong.
62. The concept of “just desserts” has been proposed by Von Hirsch as a theoretical model to guide justice policy.
Which statement reflects that just desserts theory is concerned with the rights of the accused?
a. The offender should not be treated as more or less blameworthy than is warranted by the character of his
or her offense.
b. An offender who violates others’ rights deserves to be punished.
c. Punishment is needed to preserve the social equity disturbed by crime.
d. Retribution justifies punishment because people get what they deserve for past deeds.