Chapter 3
Foreign Exchange Determination
and Forecasting
Note: In the sixth edition of Global Investments, the exchange rate quotation symbols differ from previous
editions. We adopted the convention that the first currency is the quoted currency in terms of units
of the second currency.
For example, €:$ = 1.4 indicates that one euro is priced at 1.4 dollars. In previous editions we used
the reversed convention $/€ = 1.4, meaning 1.4 dollars per euro.
All problems in this test bank still use the old convention and have not been adapted to reflect the
new quotation symbols used in the 6th edition.
◼ Questions and Problems
1. In 1995, the Thai baht is pegged to a basket of currencies. Assume that the baht exchange rate is set
at 25 baht per U.S. dollar. Thailand is experiencing rapid economic growth, with extensive ongoing
foreign investment. Consumer price index (CPI) inflation in Thailand is somewhat higher than in the
United States, and the current account in Thailand is in deficit. Nevertheless, Thailand has no
problem maintaining its fixed exchange rate with the dollar.
a. Explain why the Thai baht does not depreciate as suggested by purchasing power parity (PPP).
b. Two years later, prospects for economic growth are much lower and investors are worried about
the political and financial uncertainties in Thailand. Explain why the Thai baht depreciates
strongly against the U.S. dollar.
Solution
2. In the 1970s, France had a dual exchange rate system in place for its residents. All business trade
transactions took place at the official, or “commercial,” exchange rate (say, 5 francs per U.S. dollar).
All foreign investments by French industrial corporations were subject to prior government authorization.
The regulation was even stricter for French financial institutions or private residents. They were not
allowed to transfer currency abroad. French tourists could not take abroad more than FF 5,000 (or its
equivalent in foreign currency) per year. French residents could buy foreign securities, but had to use