Scenario Questions
Traditionally, zoologists have placed birds in their own class, Aves. More recently, molecular evidence
has shown that birds are more closely related to reptiles than their anatomy reveals. Genetically, birds
are more closely related to crocodiles than crocodiles are to turtles. Thus, bird anatomy has become
highly modified as they have adapted to flight, without their genes having undergone nearly as much
change.
62) Taxonomically, what should be done with the birds?
A) The traditional stance is correct. Such dramatic morphological change as undergone by birds merits
that the birds be placed in their own order, separate from the reptiles.
B) The birds should be reclassified, and their new taxon should be the subclass Aves. Genetic similarity
trumps morphological dissimilarity.
C) The rest of the reptiles should be reclassified as a subclass within the class Aves.
D) Science is consensual. Taxonomy is a science. Variant classification schemes involving the birds
should be tolerated until consensus is reached.
63) Traditional zoologists have long agreed that birds evolved from dinosaurs. What keeps such
zoologists from agreeing that birds, like dinosaurs, should be considered reptiles?
A) There is not yet enough evidence to be sure.
B) Stubbornness, insofar as they are unwilling to change their thinking when new data warrants it.
C) They deny the validity of genetic molecular data.
D) They differ in what they consider to be important traits for assigning organisms to the class Reptilia.
64) For a proponent of PhyloCode classification, what is true of the reptile clade if birds are not included
in it?
A) It becomes paraphyletic and, thus, an invalid reflection of evolutionary history.
B) It becomes a subclass, instead of a class.
C) It becomes a superclass, whereas the birds remain a class.
D) PhyloCode does not concern itself with what is, or is not, a clade.