CHAPTER 25: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 5
a. a distinct harm separate from that affecting the general public.
b. a lesser harm than an injunction would impose on Plywood &
Particleboard.
c. Plywood & Particleboard’s failure to use reasonable care to avert herm
to Quinn.
d. the same harm as that affecting the general public.
Fact Pattern 25-1 (Questions 3–4 apply)
Open Pit Excavation Inc. operates a rock quarry next to Robyn’s vineyard and winery.
Robyn files a suit against Open Pit, alleging that the quarry is a nuisance and
unreasonably interferes with Robyn’s enjoyment of her property.
3. Refer to Fact Pattern 25-1. The court is most likely to award Robyn an
injunction
a. if letting the pollution continue is equally as harmful as stopping it.
b. if letting the pollution continue is less harmful than stopping it.
c. if letting the pollution continue is more harmful than stopping it.
d. under no circumstances.
4. Refer to Fact Pattern 25-1. The court is most likely to award Robyn damages
a. if letting the pollution continue is equally as harmful as stopping it.
b. if letting the pollution continue is less harmful than stopping it.
c. if letting the pollution continue is more harmful than stopping it.
d. under no circumstances.
5. Nashville, Tennessee, passes an ordinance to regulate waste disposal. The
disposal of waste may also be regulated by
a. all other levels of government.
b. no other levels of government.
c. the federal government only .
d. the Tennessee state government only.