The Short-Run Trade-off between Inflation and Unemployment 8649
65. Refer to Monetary Policy in Flosserland. Suppose that the Flosserland Department of Finance
has run a public relations campaign claiming it will reduce inflation to 12.5% and that it actually
reduces inflation to that level. Suppose that the public was very skeptical and in fact thought the
Flosserland Department of Finance was going to raise inflation to 30% so it could increase its
expenditures. Then
a. unemployment falls, but it would have fallen less if people had been expecting 25% inflation.
b. unemployment falls, but it would have fallen less if people had been expecting 35% inflation.
c. unemployment rises, but it would have risen less if people had been expecting 25% inflation.
d. unemployment rises, but it would have risen less if people had been expecting 35% inflation.
66. Refer to Monetary Policy in Flosserland. Suppose the Flosserland Department of Finance has
run a public relations campaign claiming it will reduce inflation to 12.5% and actually reduces
inflation to that level. Suppose at first that the public thought inflation would only drop to 18%, but
eventually become convinced that the inflation rate will stay at 12.5%.
a. unemployment rises in the short run, and remains higher than it’s original value in the long run.
b. unemployment rises in the short run, and is the same as it’s original value in the long run.
c. unemployment falls in the short run, and is lower than it’s original value in the long run.
d. unemployment falls in the short run, and is the same as it’s original value in the long run.