Chapter 20: Inventory Management: Economic Order Quantity, JIT, and the Theory of Constraints
79. When comparing the traditional approach of inventory management to JIT, which of the following statements is
true?
a. The traditional approach accepts the existence of setup costs, but not carrying costs or inventories. JIT
accepts the existence of setup and carrying costs, but pushes for zero inventories.
b. The traditional approach accepts the existence of carrying costs and inventories, but not setup costs. JIT
accepts the existence of setup costs but not carrying costs and pushes for zero inventories.
c. The traditional approach accepts the existence of both setup costs and carrying costs and attempts to find
the order quantity that best balances those costs. JIT does not accept either setup costs or carrying costs and
pushes for zero inventory levels.
d. The traditional approach does not accept carrying costs or setup costs. JIT minimizes both setup and
carrying costs by finding the best order quantity to balance these costs.
80. One of the traditional reasons for holding inventory is to take advantage of quantity discounts and hedge against
future price increases. The JIT solution is to
a. reduce setup costs.
b. reduce lead time.
c. use long–term contracts with suppliers.
d. use total quality control.
81. One of the traditional reasons for holding inventory is to avoid shutdowns due to defective parts. The JIT solution is
to
a. reduce setup costs.
b. reduce lead time.
c. use total preventive maintenance.
d. use total quality control.
82. One of the traditional reasons for holding finished goods inventories is to ensure a firm‘s ability to meet delivery
dates. The JIT solution is to
a. reduce setup costs.
b. reduce lead time.
c. use total preventive maintenance.
d. use total quality control.