of employees, and she was one of the employees who was asked to leave without being provided good cause or an
explanation. In this scenario, Linda is protected under Section 3(a) of META which says that an:
a. employee can be fired without any reason.
b. employee may not be terminated without good cause.
c. employee can be terminated in financial crises.
d. employee may not be terminated with good cause.
41. Peter, an employee of Light Ware was terminated from his job without wages and benefits for a period of three
months. This was in violation of META. Under META his claim is subject to:
a. Court.
b. Administration.
c. Employer.
d. Arbitration.
42. Adam was an employee of ABC Corporation and he discovered the management was hiring illegal immigrants in most
of its factories. He raised objection against the employer’s practices and provided information to the law enforcing
agencies regarding the illegal activities. The employer retaliated against Adam by terminating his employment. In this
scenario, Adam is protected under:
a. Pennsylvania Human Relation Act which prohibits employee retaliation.
b. Section 203 and Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for illegal strikes.
c. OSHA and Title VII which protect employees who blow the whistle on illegal practice.
d. Section 203 of Title VII for breach of contract.
43. Watson, a Director of a telecom company in Florida, entered into a written contract with Carter Telecon. The contract
outlined the services his company would provide in exchange for a fixed monthly rate. This is an example of:
a. an implied contract.
b. an express contract.
c. a specification of contract.
d. a breach of contract.
44. Brandy and Matthew are neighbors and live in Texas. Matthew was renovating his house, which caused dust and
debris to collect in Brandy’s front yard. Unfortunately her son was highly allergic to these particulates and fell grievously
ill. In this case, Matthew violates:
a. the U.S. Constitution.
b. the Labor Act.
c. tort laws.
d. breach of trust.
45. Lionel, an African American resident of Pennsylvania was employed in a garment factory. He had a public fallout
with his white male co-worker, Tom. Following this, Lionel was fired from his job while Tom was let off with a warning.
Lionel contended that he was fired because of his race. In this scenario, Lionel is most likely to file his case under:
a. the Gender Discrimination Act.
b. tort laws.