makes domestic producers better off.
makes domestic consumers better off.
makes both domestic producers and consumers better off.
makes everyone worse off.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) went into effect in 1994. NAFTA reduced
trade barriers among the United States, Mexico and Canada. Many people in the United States
opposed the agreement for fear that it would result in a loss of jobs and lower wages. Most
economists have concluded that
although some jobs were created in the U.S. there has been a net loss of U.S. jobs to Mexico
and Canada.
in fact, no workers lost their jobs as a result of NAFTA and wages of U.S. workers have not
fallen.
although consumers have benefited from lower prices, the opposition was correct.
although some workers lost their jobs NAFTA helped the U.S. economy become more
efficient and expanded consumption.
In the 1980s Japan agreed to limit the quantity of automobiles it would export to the United States.
Why did the Japanese government agree to this trade restriction?
The Japanese government wanted more automobiles to be available for export to countries
other than the United States.
The Japanese government feared that the alternative would be a tariff or quota on imports of
Japanese automobiles imposed by the U.S. government.
Japanese automobile producers lobbied for the restrictions in order to increase the price of
their exports to the U.S.
The Japanese government wanted to limit sales to the United States in order to make more
automobiles available for Japanese consumers.
A