Which of the following statements is false?
In the WACC and APV methods, we value a project based on its free cash flow, which is
computed ignoring interest and debt payments.
In the flow–to–equity (FTE) valuation method, we explicitly calculate the free cash flow
available to equity holders taking into account all payments to and from debt holders.
In the flow–to–equity valuation method, the cash flows to equity holders are then discounted
using the weighted average cost of capital.
The first step in the FTE method is to determine the project’s free cash flow to equity (FCFE).
Which of the following statements is false?
The WACC and APV methods compute the firm’s enterprise value, so that a separate
valuation of the other components of the firm’s capital structure is needed to determine the
value of equity.
The FTE approach does not have the same disadvantage associated with the APV approach:
We don’t need to compute the project’s debt capacity to determine interest and net borrowing
before we can make the capital budgeting decision.
The FTE method can offer an advantage when calculating the value of equity for the entire
firm, if the firm’s capital structure is complex and the market values of other securities in the
firm’s capital structure are not known.
If the debt–equity ratio changes over time, the risk of equity–and, therefore, its cost of capital
–will change as well.
Consider the following equation for the Project WACC with a fixed debt schedule:
rwacc = rU– dc[rD +f(rU–rD)]
The term f in this equations represents
a measure of the permanence of the debt level.
the dollar amount of debt outstanding.
the annual adjustment percentage to the amount of debt.