38. The Supreme Court has used case law to define the boundaries of the Miranda warning since this landmark decision
was handed down. Which is inaccurate pertaining to these boundaries?
a. Suspects must be fully aware of all the possible outcomes of waiving their rights for the Miranda warning to
be considered to have been given properly.
b. Admissible evidence can be obtained without a Miranda warning if the information sought is needed to protect
public safety.
c. At trial, the testimony of a witness is permissible even if her or his identity was revealed by the defendant in
violation of the Miranda rule.
d. Once a criminal suspect has invoked his or her Miranda rights, police officials cannot reinitiate interrogation
in the absence of counsel.
39. When an officer does not have probable cause to arrest but her or his suspicions are legitimately aroused by the
unusual or suspicious behavior of an individual, the officer can:
a. request an arrest warrant.
b. perform a stop and frisk.
c. request immediate backup.
d. conduct a search incident to an arrest.
40. Under which circumstances can police officers not perform a warrantless search?
a. when consent to search is willingly given
b. when it is performed incident to a lawful arrest
c. if there is probable cause to believe an automobile was involved in a crime
d. when a housesitter allows the officers to enter and search the premises