16) The Ecke’s family virtual monopoly on commercial poinsettia production by grafting
together two varieties of the plant ended around 1996 when university researchers were able to
independently make the same discovery. The Ecke family did not patent their grafting process.
Would the Ecke’s have been better off if they had patented their process of growing poinsettias?
A) Yes, it would have allowed them to earn economic profits indefinitely.
B) That depends on how long they had a monopoly before university researchers made the
discovery. If the discovery was made after the period of time when patents expire, then the Ecke
family is not any better off.
C) No, even with a patent protection, the Ecke family cannot prevent government-funded
academic institutions from researching into plant breeding.
D) No, seeking patent protection necessitates divulging enough information that would enable
others to information to discover ways of grafting poinsettias that were similar to the Ecke
method but that did not violate the patent.
17) The De Beers Company, one of the longest-lived monopolies, is facing increasing
competition. One source of competition comes from people who might resell their previously
owned diamonds. Why is De Beers worried that people might resell their previously owned
diamonds?
A) because De Beers will not be able to guarantee the quality of previously owned diamonds and
fears that its reputation might be harmed
B) because the availability of previously owned diamonds would increase the market demand for
diamonds and dilute De Beers’ monopoly
C) because previously owned diamonds would be a close substitute to newly mined diamonds
and therefore reduce De Beers’ market power
D) because the availability of previously owned diamonds would make the market demand curve
for diamonds more inelastic and force De Beers to lower its price