5. Which of the following employee rights is NOT protected by the NLRA?
a. to engage in self-organization
b. to go on strike
c. to engage in other concerted activities
d. to refrain from such activities
e. all of the above employee rights are protected by the NLRA
6. In Mastec Advanced Technologies, 26 service technicians were fired after appearing on a
television news show to complain about their employer’s instructions about how to
persuade customers to install phone connections for their satellite television service, and
the charge-backs to employees’ pay if they did not procure such connections. Phone
connections were not necessary for the service to work, but the company earned more
money if phone connections were installed. Regarding the terminations, the court ruled:
a. for the employer, since it is not a protected concerted activity for an employee to
make disparaging remarks to 3rd parties, since it shows disloyalty
b. for the employer, because its business policies were within its discretion
c. for the employees, because they did not speak disparagingly about their employer
d. for the employees, because they spoke truthfully about an ongoing labor dispute
e. c and d
7. Which of the following would NOT be considered a concerted activity?
a. members of a union that meet to discuss problems with working conditions at
their workplace
b. employees who are not members of a union that meet to discuss problems with
working conditions at their workplace
c. a single employee that writes to a supervisor complaining about the refusal to
grant her vacation time for the exact period of time she requested
d. a single employee that writes to a supervisor complaining about the frequently
malfunctioning air conditioning and extreme indoor heat at an assembly plant
e. c and d
8. An employer announced that it was going to close a union facility, and entered into
negotiations with the union. Six drivers learned of an upcoming meeting, met over coffee
to formulate their questions, and went to the site of the meeting. A union official told
them to return to work, but the drivers insisted, and eventually were able to introduce
themselves to the management representatives. They returned to work after having been
gone for 3 hours, but were fired for being absent without authorization. The NLRB ruled
in favor of the drivers, and the employer appealed. On appeal, the court ruled:
a. for the employer, since the employees essentially walked off the job during
working hours without authorization, which is not a protected concerted activity
b. for the employer, since its representatives had met with the employees, so they
had complied with their obligations