22) Refer to Table 14-2. For each firm, is there a better outcome than the current situation in
which each firm charges the low price and earns a profit of $7,000?
A) Yes, the firms can implicitly collude and agree to charge a higher price.
B) No, there is no incentive for each firm to consider any other strategy.
C) No, any other strategy hurts consumers.
D) Yes, each firm can implicitly agree to increase output and not to deviate from a low price.
23) Refer to Table 14-2. Suppose Wal-Mart and Target both advertise that they will match the
lowest price offered by any competitor. What is the purpose of such a strategy?
A) to signal to each other not to charge below the current low price
B) to signal to each other that they will not hesitate to initiate a price war
C) to signal to each other that they intend to charge the high price
D) to signal to each other to share the market equally
24) Refer to Table 14-2. Suppose pricing PlayStations is a repeated game in which Wal-Mart
and Target will be selling the game system in competition over a long period of time. In this
case, what is the most likely outcome?
A) a noncooperative equilibrium in which each firm charges the high price
B) a cooperative equilibrium in which each firm charges the high price
C) a noncooperative equilibrium in which each firm charges the low price
D) a cooperative equilibrium in which each firm charges the low price