Chapter 13 – Short-Run Decision Making: Relevant Costing
Relevant cost per unit= $3.00 + $1.50 + $2.75 + $1.50* =
*Fixed overhead = $5.00 – ($5.00 × 70%) = $1.50
96. Refer to Figure 13–7. Assume that all of the fixed overhead is allocated and cannot be avoided. Should Ring purchase
the part from the outside supplier?
Yes, income will increase by $104,500.
No, income will decrease by $104,500.
Yes, income will increase by $78,500.
Yes, income will increase by $95,500.
Yes, income will increase by $137,500.
Relevant cost per unit = $3.00 + $1.50 + $2.75 = $7.25
Decrease in income if purchased = ($7.25 – $12.00) ×
Figure 13–8.
Kerrigan Lumber Yard receives 12,000 large trees each year that they process into rough logs. Currently, Kerrigan sells
the rough logs for $75 each. Kerrigan is considering processing the logs further into refined lumber. Each log can be
processed into 200 feet of refined lumber at an additional cost of $0.40 per foot. The refined lumber can be sold for $0.95
per foot.
97. Refer to Figure 13-8. Should Kerrigan process the rough logs into refined lumber?
Yes, income will increase by $35 per log.
Yes, income will increase by $110 per log.
Yes, income will increase by $75 per log.
No, income will decrease by $35 per log.
No, income will decrease by $110 per log.
98. Refer to Figure 13–8. Assume that the cost of getting the 12,000 large trees falls by half. Should Kerrigan sell the
rough logs at split-off or process it further?
Process further, the reduction in the cost of trees makes that option more profitable than it was before.
Sell at split-off because the decrease in the cost of the trees makes that option more profitable than it was
before.
Sell at split-off, the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.