Chapter 13 – Short-Run Decision Making: Relevant Costing
Make the part because it will save $100,000 over buying it.
Buy the part because it will save $100,000 over making it.
Make the part because it will save $1,100,000 over buying it.
Buy the part because it will save 1,100,000 over making it.
Buy the part because it will save $300,000 over making it.
91. Refer to Figure 13–2. Now suppose that ColorPro discovers that other costs will increase by $7,000 per year if the
component is purchased rather than made internally. Should ColorPro make or buy the part?
Make the part because it will save $100,000 over buying it.
Buy the part because it will save $100,000 over making it.
Make the part because it will save $107,000 over buying it.
Buy the part because it will save $107,000 over making it.
Make the part because it will save $10,000 over buying it.
92. Refer to Figure 13–2. Which of the following is a qualitative factor that might affect ColorPro’s decision?
Filbert has an outstanding reputation for quality.
Ordering from Filbert would give ColorPro a chance to see how well Filbert could meet JIT standards for
ColorPro’s other products.
Filbert is known for the reliability of its products.
Making the part in-house would help ColorPro avoid layoffs of direct and indirect labor.
Figure 13–6.
Autry Company manufactures veterinary products. One joint process involves refining a chemical (dactylyte) into two
chemicals − dac and tyl. One batch of 5,000 gallons of dactylyte can be converted to 2,000 gallons of dac and 3,000
gallons of tyl at a total joint processing cost of $12,000. At the split-off point, dac can be sold for $3 per gallon and tyl can
be sold for $4 per gallon. Autry has just learned of a new process to convert dac into prodac. The new process costs
$4,000 and yields 1,700 gallons of prodac for every 2,000 gallons of dac. Prodac sells for $5 per gallon.
93. Refer to Figure 13–6. What is Autry’s profit from refining one batch of dactylyte if both dac and tyl are sold at the