CHAPTER 12: STATUS, PRESTIGE, AND SOCIAL DOMINANCE
Chapter Summary
This chapter explored the evolutionary psychology of status and social dominance, phenomena that are
observed widely throughout the animal world from crayfish to humans. A dominance hierarchy refers to
the fact that some individuals within a group reliably gain greater access to key resources—resources that
contribute to survival or reproduction. The existence of such hierarchies poses adaptive problems to
which animals have evolved solutions, including motivation to get ahead and strategies to cope with
subordination. Size is an important determinant of dominance in some species, but in primate species
such as chimpanzees and humans, competence knowledge, generous displays, and social skills at enlisting
allies become critical to attaining high status. High-ranking animals often, although not always, gain
preferential access to key resources needed for survival and reproduction.
The theory of prestige-for-service proposes that humans have adaptations both to lead and to follow based
on the principle of reciprocal exchange. Leaders provide key services to followers in the form of
organizational skills, wisdom, knowledge, intelligence, and sometime physical formidability. These
leadership qualities increase coordination within the group and lead to more beneficial outcomes for
followers, especially in competition with other groups. In return, followers cede prestige (“respect”) and
resources to leaders in exchange for the services they provide. Both leaders and followers benefit by this
reciprocal exchange.
Denise Cummins proposed dominance theory to explain the cognitive mechanisms that might have
evolved to negotiate dominance hierarchies. Dominance theory has two key propositions. First, humans
have evolved domain-specific strategies for reasoning about social norms involving dominance
hierarchies. These include understanding aspects such as permissions (e.g., who is allowed to mate with
whom), obligations (e.g., who must support whom in a social contest), and prohibitions (e.g., who cannot
join the ceremonial war dance). Second, these cognitive strategies are predicted to emerge prior to, and
separately from, other types of reasoning strategies. Empirical evidence supporting this theory includes:
(1) Children as young as age three appear to reason about dominance hierarchies, including the property
of transitivity; (2) people tend to remember the faces of cheaters more if the cheaters are lower in status
than if they are higher in status; and (3) people tend to look for violations of rules among lower-status
individuals when they are asked to assume the perspective of a higher-status individual.
Whereas dominance theory emphasizes the reasoning mechanisms that underlie dominance, SAHP theory
proposes emotional mechanisms designed to solve the adaptive problems posed by living in social