Chapter 11 Game Theory
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. A player in a game theoretic model is:
a.
anyone working for a firm that is operating strategically
b.
a decision-making entity at a firm involved in a strategic game
c.
a firm that is operating as a perfect competitor
d.
a monopolist who produces a unique product with no close substitutes
e.
a stockholder at a firm involved in a strategic game
2. The difference between game trees and decision trees is:
a.
that game trees are not useful in strategic situations
b.
that decision trees describe actions that depend on the behavior of rivals
c.
that game trees have interactive payoffs
d.
that decision trees are a function of many individuals and the state of nature
e.
none of the above
3. A feasible strategy set is:
a.
all actions with a nonzero probability of occurring
b.
only actions that have a 50 percent or greater probability of occurring
c.
actions that result in positive profits for the firm
d.
actions that a decision maker is willing to take
e.
the one outcome that the decision maker chooses
4. Game theory is useful for understanding oligopoly behavior because:
a.
there are so many firms in an oligopoly that all are price takers
b.
firms must differentiate their products if they are to remain in business
c.
firms recognize that because there are only a few firms mutual interdependence is
important
d.
without it firms would not be able to maintain cartel agreements
e.
it allows firms to develop greater monopoly power
5. If a firm has a dominant strategy:
a.
its optimal strategy depends on the play of rivals
b.
its optimal strategy is always the same, even if payoffs change
c.
it is determined by the behavior of only one key rival
d.
it receives the same profits regardless of the strategy of rivals
e.
its optimal strategy is independent of the play of rivals
6. A Nash equilibrium occurs when:
a.
each player has a dominant strategy
b.
each player receives the same final payoff
c.
each player believes it is doing the best it can given the behavior of rivals
d.
there is no dominant strategy for any player
e.
payoffs are independent of the actions taken by rivals
7. If player 1 has a dominant strategy, then player 2:
a.
must also have a dominant strategy
b.
may or may not have a dominant strategy, but will always lead to a Nash
equilibrium
c.
may or may not have a dominant strategy
d.
will not be able to reach an optimal solution to the game
e.
will block this dominant strategy and force player 1 to another strategy
8. A dominant strategy is one that:
a.
beats all others, regardless of the opponent’s choice
b.
beats all others, given the opponent’s choice
c.
is beaten by all others, regardless of the opponent’s choice
d.
is beaten by all others, given the opponent’s choice
e.
beats at least one other, given the opponent’s choice
9. In a two-player game in which each player has four options, how many outcomes can there
be?
a.
1
b.
4
c.
8
d.
16
e.
64
10. By definition, a Nash equilibrium in a duopoly is the situation in which each player:
a.
plays a dominant strategy
b.
plays the best strategy given the other’s strategies
c.
gets the highest possible payoff
d.
gets the highest payoff possible without lowering the opponent’s payoff
e.
is happy with the outcome
11. Getting to a Nash equilibrium requires:
a.
each knowing the opponent’s payoffs and cooperation
b.
knowing the opponent’s payoffs but not cooperation
c.
cooperation but not knowing the opponent’s payoffs
d.
neither cooperation nor knowing the opponent’s payoffs
e.
either cooperation or knowing the opponent’s payoffs, depending on the game
12. Given the following payoff matrix, who has a dominant strategy?
a.
it depends on what the other player does
b.
both players
c.
neither player
d.
A does; B doesn’t
e.
B does; A doesn’t
13. Given the following payoff matrix, what will A’s profits be?
a.
1
b.
2
c.
3
d.
4
e.
unknown until B’s action is observed
14. How many Nash equilibria are there in this payoff matrix?
a.
0
b.
1
c.
2
d.
3
e.
4
15. How many Nash equilibria are there in this payoff matrix?
a.
0
b.
1
c.
2
d.
3
e.
4
16. Which pair of strategies would cooperative cartel members A and B choose given this payoff
matrix?
a.
W, Y
b.
W, Z
c.
X, Y
d.
X, Z
e.
either X, Y or W, Z
17. Which pair of strategies would competing firms A and B choose given this payoff matrix?
a.
W, Y
b.
W, Z
c.
X, Y
d.
X, Z
e.
Either X, Y or W, Z
18. Strategic foresight is the ability to make decisions today that are rational based on:
a.
complete uncertainty about the future
b.
our best information about what will happen in the future
c.
what we know only about behavior in the past
d.
information that we have only about our own behavior in the past
e.
incorrect information about the past
19. Suppose that firm A finds itself facing the following payoff matrix in its rivalry with firm B:
A threatens to play strategy W. This threat is:
a.
credible because the Nash equilibrium occurs where A plays W and B plays Z
b.
credible because the joint optimal solution occurs where A plays W and B plays Z
c.
not credible because A’s dominant strategy is to play X
d.
credible because A’s dominant strategy is to play W
e.
not credible because B will never play strategy Z
20. A preemptive strategy has the same goal as:
a.
rigid pricing
b.
price wars
c.
price leadership
d.
limit pricing
e.
most-favored-customer clauses
21. Radio City promises if you can find a lower advertised price for anything you bought at
Radio City, anywhere in town within 30 days, it will return the difference plus 20 percent. A
sophisticated game theoretic analysis suggests Radio City may be:
a.
losing money in the long run
b.
colluding with other stores
c.
using a commitment to threaten competitors
d.
preempting competitors
e.
using price leadership
22. Potential entrant E threatens to enter incumbent I’s market and I threatens to lower price to
P should E enter. It is crucial for E to believe I’s threat that:
a.
P > I’s average total cost
b.
P > I’s average variable cost
c.
P is low enough to discourage E
d.
I could conceivably charge P without E’s threat
e.
I’s profit with P and no entry are better than expected profits with entry
23. A most-favored-customer clause:
a.
is a commitment but not a threat
b.
is a threat but not a commitment
c.
is both a threat and a commitment
d.
is neither a threat nor a commitment
e.
could be either a threat or a commitment depending on the terms
24. Useful strategies to deter entry include:
a.
increasing advertising
b.
increasing prices
c.
decreasing capacity
d.
increasing capacity
e.
a and d
25. Consider the decision tree below. This tree illustrates hypothetical payoffs to General Mills
(GM) and Quaker Oats (Q) if they engage in a price war.
If GM cuts prices, the greatest potential gain is:
a.
$5 million per year
b.
$10 million per year
c.
$2 million per year
d.
$3 million per year
e.
none of the above
26. Consider the decision tree in problem 25. If GM cuts prices and Quaker Oats follows this
behavior:
a.
GM loses $10 million
b.
Quaker Oats loses $10 million
c.
GM loses $2 million
d.
Quaker Oats loses $2 million
e.
both firms gain $3 million
27. Refer to the payoff matrix below. Which of the following is a Nash equilibrium?
a.
Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 1
b.
Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 2
c.
Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 2
d.
Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 1
e.
none of the above
28. Refer to the payoff matrix below. Which of the following is a Nash equilibrium?
a.
Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 1
b.
Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 2
c.
Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 2
d.
Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 1
e.
none of the above
29. Refer to the payoff matrix below. Which of the following is a Nash equilibrium?
a.
Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 1
b.
Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 2
c.
Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 2
d.
Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 1
e.
none of the above