19. Internal review of police misconduct involves review:
a. of misconduct by civilians.
b. of misconduct by a special team of officers in the department.
c. by a special master appointed by the court.
d. by officers in another police department.
20. The major objection to internal review of police misconduct is:
a. police officers do not trust the officers conducting the investigation of misconduct.
b. a police department has to divert resources away from fighting crime.
c. the police should not be policing themselves.
d. external review is less expensive and better received by the media.
21. Individual officers or government agencies cannot be sued for failing to stop private people from violating their
rights by inflicting injuries on them. This is known as the:
a. no special relationship rule.
b. no affirmative duty to protect rule.
c. state did not create the danger rule.
d. avoid danger rule.
22. When the government takes a person into custody against their will the government:
a. does not have a duty to protect them from being injured by other private persons.
b. created the danger taking them into custody, so it must protect them.
c. must protect them because a special relationship has been created with the person in custody who cannot
protect themselves.
d. only has the duty to protect the person in custody from harm by government officers.
Chapter 11: CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS II: OTHER REMEDIES AGAINST OFFICIAL
MISCONDUCT
CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS II: OTHER REMEDIES AGAINST OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT