9. Interpersonal conflicts may result from conflicting functions, objectives, career
aspirations, or personalities. These conflicts stay at the personal level and do not
become elevated to the intergroup or departmental level.
10. Group behavior research suggests that cooperation in some situations, such as when
the task is complicated and requires sharing of information, promotes productivity.
11. For groups in competition with one another, the winning group will likely become
more cohesive and the losing group will become more concerned for their
members’ psychological needs.
12. Organizational conflict must not necessarily be reduced or eliminated, but managed
to enhance individual, group, and organizational effectiveness.
13. With high concern for self and low concern for others, the “obliging conflict style”
attempts to attain personal objectives and often ignores the needs of others, forcing
win-lose situations.
14. Although some behavioral scientists suggest that there is one best style to resolve
conflict, most suggest an examination of styles, so that the most appropriate style
for a given situation can be applied.
15. The increasing popularity of decentralized structures and matrix organization, in
which many organization members wind up reporting to two or more bosses, has
increased executives reliance on authority and reduced the reliance on interpersonal
conflict management skills.
16. To deal with intergroup conflict, the OD practitioner seeks interventions that
decrease interaction and the frequency of communication between groups in order
to avoid the number of contacts between groups.
17. OD techniques are aimed at avoiding “win–lose” situations while emphasizing
“win–win” aspects of the situation.
18. OD techniques for dealing with intergroup problems include the Avoidance-
Maintenance Theory and Conservancy Methodology.
19. Confrontation refers to the process in which the parties directly engage each other
and focus on the conflict between them.