CHAPTER 10: AGGRESSION AND WARFARE
Chapter Summary
From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, aggression is not a singular or a unitary phenomenon.
Rather, it represents a collection of strategies that are manifested under highly specific contextual
conditions. The mechanisms underlying aggression have emerged, in this view, as solutions, albeit
sometimes repugnant ones, to distinct adaptive problems such as resource procurement, intrasexual
competition, hierarchy negotiation, and mate retention.
From this perspective, we expect variability in aggression—between the sexes, among individuals, over
the life span, and across cultures. It illustrates the point that variability does not imply that biology is
irrelevant. An evolutionary psychological perspective is truly interactionist: It specifies a set of causal
conditions in which particular features of the perpetrator, victim, social context, and adaptive problem are
likely to evoke aggression as a strategic solution.
An evolutionary perspective suggests at least six classes of benefits that would have accrued to ancestors
who used an aggressive strategy: co-opting the resources of others, defending oneself and one’s kin
against attack, inflicting costs on intrasexual rivals, negotiating status and power hierarchies, deterring
rivals from future aggression, and deterring long-term mates from infidelity or defection.
Many contexts are linked with aggression occurring within each sex-of-perpetrator by sex-of-victim
combination. Contexts triggering men’s aggression against other men include being unemployed and
unmarried—circumstances that suggest that men are on a path to being excluded from mating, which may
trigger a risky aggressive strategy. Men also aggress against other men when their status and reputation
are threatened and when they observe or suspect a rival of sexually “poaching” on their mate.
Women aggress against other women primarily in the context of competition over attracting or retaining
mates, over friendship violations, and sometimes over food. Women, however, are far less likely to use
physical aggression, preferring instead to derogate their competitors verbally or to socially ostracize them.
Two prominent derogation tactics are calling their rivals promiscuous and impugning their rival’s
physical appearance—both of which attain their effectiveness because they violate men’s desires in a
long-term mate.