19. The jury found Mohammed, the plaintiff, was partially at fault in the accident. His award of
$10,000.00 recognized that he was 10 percent at fault. This is an example of the theory of:
A. Comparative negligence;
B. Contributory negligence;
C. Res ipsa loquitor;
D.
Non
pro bono;
E. All of the above.
20. Which of the following is not a theory of recovery in tort law?
A. Negligence;
B. Strict liability;
C. Intentional torts;
D. Breach of warranty;
E. Product liability.
21. Which of the following is a business-related tort?
A. Your local professional football team opens negotiations with Peyton Manning to persuade him to
abandon his $98,000,000 contract with the Indianapolis Colts to come to play for them;
B. A university president fires a whistleblower for advising the criminal d strict attorney of the president‘s
malfeasance;
C. A new soft drink company is marketing its product, “Goca–Cola,“ in a red can with white waves
running horizontally and the name in script;
D. A corporation retains Richard Roe to burglarize the home of the C.E.O.‘s leading foe in order to
obtain damaging material;
E. All of the above.
Essay Questions
1. Identify and discuss various types of interests protected by tort law.
2. Identify and discuss the elements of a prima facie case of negligence.
3. Identify and discuss various types of injuries for which the plaintiff might recover damages.
4. Discuss strict liability torts.
5. Discuss immunity as protection in litigation.