Chapter 10: Cost of Capital Conceptual M/C Page 365
55. Cranberry Corp. has two divisions of equal size: a computer
manufacturing division and a data processing division. Its CFO
believes that stand-alone data processor companies typically have a
WACC of 8%, while stand-alone computer manufacturers typically have a
12% WACC. He also believes that the data processing and manufacturing
divisions have the same risk as their typical peers. Consequently, he
estimates that the composite, or corporate, WACC is 10%. A consultant
has suggested using an 8% hurdle rate for the data processing division
and a 12% hurdle rate for the manufacturing division. However, the CFO
disagrees, and he has assigned a 10% WACC to all projects in both
divisions. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. While the decision to use just one WACC will result in its accepting
more projects in the manufacturing division and fewer projects in
its data processing division than if it followed the consultant’s
recommendation, this should not affect the firm’s intrinsic value.
b. The decision not to adjust for risk means, in effect, that it is
favoring the data processing division. Therefore, that division is
likely to become a larger part of the consolidated company over
time.
c. The decision not to adjust for risk means that the company will
accept too many projects in the manufacturing division and too few in
the data processing division. This will lead to a reduction in the
firm’s intrinsic value over time.
d. The decision not to risk-adjust means that the company will accept
too many projects in the data processing business and too few
projects in the manufacturing business. This will lead to a
reduction in its intrinsic value over time.
e. The decision not to risk adjust means that the company will accept
too many projects in the manufacturing business and too few projects
in the data processing business. This may affect the firm’s capital
structure but it will not affect its intrinsic value.
56. Safeco Company and Risco Inc are identical in size and capital
structure. However, the riskiness of their assets and cash flows are
somewhat different, resulting in Safeco having a WACC of 10% and Risco
a WACC of 12%. Safeco is considering Project X, which has an IRR of
10.5% and is of the same risk as a typical Safeco project. Risco is
considering Project Y, which has an IRR of 11.5% and is of the same
risk as a typical Risco project.
Now assume that the two companies merge and form a new company,
Safeco/Risco Inc. Moreover, the new company’s market risk is an
average of the pre-merger companies’ market risks, and the merger has
no impact on either the cash flows or the risks of Projects X and Y.
Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. If the firm evaluates these projects and all other projects at the
new overall corporate WACC, it will probably become riskier over
time.
b. If evaluated using the correct post-merger WACC, Project X would
have a negative NPV.
c. After the merger, Safeco/Risco would have a corporate WACC of 11%.
Therefore, it should reject Project X but accept Project Y.
d. Safeco/Risco’s WACC, as a result of the merger, would be 10%.