8. Regarding arbitration, which of the following statements is true?
a. historically, arbitration has been used to resolve disputes over contractual rights
b. arbitrators’ decisions are usually advisory and not considered final
c. arbitrators have less control over the outcomes of disputes than do mediators.
d. arbitration is always more costly and time-consuming than litigation
e. none of these
9. Regarding the interrelationship of federal and state employment laws:
a. state laws must be identical to federal law or the state law is void
b. states may pass laws which reduce employee rights, but may not enact laws that
expand employee protections granted in federal laws
c. states may pass laws which expand employee rights, but may not enact laws that
reduce employee protections granted in federal laws
d. employment law is exclusively a federal domain, so states may not enact laws when
federal law already exists
10. In Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, plaintiff Casias, a cancer patient and Wal-Mart employee, was
prescribed medical marijuana for his symptoms by his physician, pursuant to the state’s new
medical marijuana law. Upon being injured at work, he was given a blood test which showed
marijuana in his system. He was fired, and sued for wrongful termination. The court ruled:
a. for the Plaintiff because he had a valid state medical marijuana registry card to
show that he was authorized to use medical marijuana
b. for the Plaintiff because he did not cause his own injury at work
c. for Wal-Mart, because the state law did not change employment-at-will
d. for Wal-Mart, because plaintiff’s marijuana use led to his injury
11. In EEOC v AutoZone, the EEOC sued AutoZone on behalf of an employee who suffered
injury and disability because his employer would not provide a reasonable accommodation
for his disability. Fed Ex argued that the damages awarded by the jury were too high, and
also offered evidence of its ADA compliance policy set forth in the employee manual. The
court ruled:
a. for the defendant AutoZone, since the establishment of an ADA compliance policy
was sufficient to establish a good faith effort to comply with the ADA
b. for the defendant AutoZone, because plaintiff had not established that he suffered
from a disability
c. for the plaintiff because the damages awarded were consistent with the damages
awarded in other cases
d. for the plaintiff because he established that he suffered from a disability
12. Which of the following is true regarding enforcement of employee rights and enforcement of
employment laws?