Chapter 1 Test Bank
True and False
1. IDEA 2004 and ESEA 2001 place more emphasis on assessing all students in attaining
the standards, leading to more students being included in the general education classroom
and more students who receive special education services to receive a regular diploma.
2. All students, regardless of disability, are required to take statewide exams, or alternative
exams to measure their progress within the general education curriculum.
3. Historically, pre-referral interventions have been intended to address bias in the referral
process and prevent unnecessary assessments, and are now part of the Response to
Intervention (RTI) model.
4. Children who fail to make academic progress through ESL services are eligible for
special education services.
5. An outcome of the use of the historical model of assessment was a large number of
students being referred for special education services who did not require them.
6. When administering a standardized test, the individual giving the test may give the test in
any manner they wish.
7. All students who are eligible for special education services are required to have an
alternative planning document in place.
8. An Individualized Education Plan (IEP) differs from an Individual Family Service Plan
(IFSP) in that an IEP includes family needs as well as the child’s needs.
9. Research has suggested that, traditionally, a teacher’s decision to refer may have been
influenced by the student having a sibling who has had school problems.
10. It is important to establish firm standards for a student’s progress and readiness to exit
special education.