a. less effective than law on the books approaches.
b. more effective than law on the books approaches.
c. equally effective as law on the books approaches.
d. not comparable to law on the books approaches.
CASE 16.2
Criminal appeals are generally routine because they seldom raise meritorious issues
(Primus, 2007; Wold & Caldeira, 1980). Current standards of effective assistance of
counsel often force lawyers to appeal, no matter how slight the odds of appellate court
reversal. As a result, a significant number of criminal appeals lack substantial merit. For
example, of the roughly 5,125 written dispositions in criminal appeals filed by
defendants in the California Court of Appeals in 2010, the court reversed only 226 (4%)
convictions (Judicial Council of California, 2011). Why do criminal appeals rarely
succeed? First, the appellate standards of review applicable to most decision-making
during criminal trials are highly deferential to trial court outcomes (Primus, 2007).
Second, appellate courts often find that no reversible error was committed during the
trial court proceedings.
What defendants did Neubauer (1991) find were most likely to win on appeal?
a. defendants convicted of nonviolent offenses and who received a relatively lenient
sentence.
b. defendants convicted of violent offenses and who received a relatively lenient
sentence.
c. defendants convicted of nonviolent offenses and who received a relatively harsh
sentence.
d. defendants convicted of violent offenses and who received a relatively harsh
sentence.