A person is “picked up for questioning” by the police and taken to the police station
interrogation room where (s)he is given Miranda warnings and questioned. (S)he was
never told “You”re under arrest”. Which of the following occurred?
a. a formal arrest.
b. a seizure tantamount to arrest.
c. a Terry stop.
d. an investigative stop.
Police detectives begin to interrogate a criminal suspect without having read the
Miranda warnings. During this initial questioning, the suspect makes an incriminating
statement. The detectives, after hearing the incriminating statement, make the suspect
aware of his Miranda rights. Questioning continues and the suspect repeats the
incriminating information. How are the courts most likely to view the statement?
a. The incriminating statement is inadmissible.
b. The incriminating statement is admissible, but any derivative evidence that can be
gathered from the information in the statement is inadmissible.
c. The incriminating statement is inadmissible, but any derivative evidence that can be
gathered from the information in the statement is admissible.
d. The incriminating statement is admissible, as is any derivative evidence that can be
gathered from the information in the statement.