Additional Case 3.2
You have recently been hired as the HR Director of a mid-sized architectural service
company that designs buildings for both private firms and federal agencies. Your
predecessor lost her job when she did not anticipate and handle an HR-based lawsuit to
the CEO’s satisfaction. The CEO believes that HRM should help the company avoid
problems. As HR Director, you have three primary tasks: to anticipate future problems,
advise management, and be an advocate for employees. Your boss doesn’t see a conflict
in these roles.
The upper-management team consists of all males who are over the age of 50. Most of
the upper-level managers have been with the company for at least 25 years. Middle
managers, who are mostly in their 30s, are 40% female, and 3% minority. Hourly
employees are 60% minority and 35% female. The communities from which the firm
hires hourly employees is approximately 75% minority and consists primarily of
Haitians and Hispanics.
You discover many incomplete employee recruitment records that lack I-9 forms. You
immediately begin to work on an affirmative action plan because of what you see
happening in the company.
Refer to Additional Case 3.2. Which of the following is most likely true about this firm?
A) A quid pro quo sexual harassment case could be made against the firm.
B) The firm is in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act.
C) A prima facie case for discrimination could be made using the four-fifths rule.
D) The firm is guilty of reverse discrimination.
Once the utilization analysis has been completed, what is the next step in developing an
affirmative action plan?
A) Setting goals for correcting the underutilization of protected class groups
B) Recruiting protected-class members for available positions
C) Redesigning jobs so that underrepresented workers are more likely to be qualified
D) Determining the percentage of protected classes in the available labor market