Ch 09 Introduction to Contracts
A promise made by the defendant.
A promise made by the plaintiff in response to the defendant’s promise.
Reliance on the defendant’s promise.
Enforcing the promise is the only way to avoid injustice.
23. One of the factors leading courts away from a laissez-faire approach to contract law was:
the movement away from requiring a writing and a seal on contracts.
a change in relative bargaining power between parties to contracts.
the assumption that promises are not legally significant.
the assumption that parties had freedom to contract and would have to live with the consequences.
24. Shelly offers to sell Jane goods both parties know are stolen. Jane accepts the offer, and agrees to pay for the goods.
Later, Jane refuses to accept or pay for the goods. If Shelly sues Jane for breach of contract, what is the probable result?
The law would enforce this valid, enforceable contract.
Jane would win as this is a voidable contract.
Shelly would win as this is a unilateral contract.
The law would not enforce Jane’s promise, as it does not have a lawful purpose.
25. Larry goes to his barber who has cut his hair for the past several years. The barber proceeds to cut his hair as they talk
about the most recent snow storm to hit the area. This is an example of a:
unilateral, implied contract.
bilateral, implied contract.
unilateral, express contract.
bilateral, express contract.
26. Robert, a minor, buys a stereo from Jane for $200. State law allows a minor to disaffirm contracts within a reasonable
time after turning 18. Robert disaffirms the contract the day after turning 18 and returns the stereo.
This contract was a valid contract, Robert cannot disaffirm.
This contract was a voidable contract, Robert can disaffirm.
This contract was a void contract.
This contract was unenforceable because it needed to be in writing to be enforceable.
27. Patty is a poor college student struggling to work and keep up with her studies. Fred, her uncle, promises to pay Patty
support of $200 per month for the next six months. Although Fred didn’t ask her to, she quits her current job in order to
devote full time to her studies for the next six months. Fred makes one payment and then stops with no explanation. If
Patty sues, what is the likely result?
Fred would win, as he did not ask Patty to quit her job.
Patty would win, as a contract was formed when Fred promised to pay her the support.
Fred would win, as family members cannot sue each other for breach of an oral promise.