31. Green Grocers, Inc., enters into a contract with Hiway Transport Company for
the delivery of a shipment of fresh produce. In a later dispute between these
parties over the delivery, the doctrine of quasi contract cannot be used
because
a. both of the parties involved are businesses.
b. at least one of the parties had greater bargaining power.
c. the subject of the contract was a service.
d. there is an actual contract covering the subject in dispute.
32. In negotiations with Coastal Distribution Company, Briggs Trucking, Inc., insists
that their contract be drafted according to certain plain language laws. These
laws concern the phrasing of
a. contracts.
b. ads.
c. product instruction manuals.
d. documents of delivery.
33. Cory believes that he and Dian agreed that he would act as her personal sports
trainer for seven workout sessions. In a later dispute, the existence of any
contract can be judged by
a. the parties’ intent as expressed in their contract.
b. what the defendant claims was the parties’ intent.
c. what the plaintiff claims was the parties’ intent.
d. what the parties agree they intended.