Ch 06 Torts and Product Liability
22. Adam decided to play a practical joke on Linda, a co-worker. As Linda was leaving the office one night, Adam,
wearing a mask, stepped out from behind some bushes. He pointed a handgun made out of licorice at her and demanded
her purse. He then pushed the candy gun to her head and told her if she told anybody he’d kill her. Linda was very scared
during the whole incident. She did not think it was funny when Adam pulled the mask off and took a bite out of the gun as
he gave her the purse back. Which statement is correct?
Adam committed an assault but not a battery.
Adam committed a battery but not an assault.
Adam committed an assault and a battery.
Adam committed neither an assault nor a battery since he used a candy gun and was only playing a joke on
Linda.
23. The intentional tort of battery involves conduct in which:
the defendant intended to harm the plaintiff.
the defendant intended a certain physical act which ends up injuring someone.
injuries are caused to someone because of the defendant’s neglect or oversight.
there is resulting punishment, including prison, for the defendant.
24. Trein, Inc. entered into a one-year, $1 million contract with Mia, a sports celebrity, to promote Trein’s products. E-
presto Inc., a competitor of Trein, was interested in having Mia promote its products and knew of her contract with Trein.
E-presto offered Mia a three-year, $5 million contract. Mia left Trein and signed with E-presto. Which statement is
correct?
Trein is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
Mia is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
E-presto is liable for tortious interference with a contract.
Both Mia and E-presto are liable for tortious interference with a contract.
25. Trein, Inc. entered into a one-year, $1 million contract with Mia, a sports celebrity, to promote Trein’s products. E-
presto Inc., a competitor of Trein, was interested in having Mia promote its products but knew of her contract with Trein.
E-presto offered Mia a three-year, $5 million contract. Mia left Trein and signed with E-presto. If Trein sues E-presto for
tortious interference with a contract, E-presto:
will be able to establish a justification since E-presto was acting to protect an existing economic interest.
will be able to establish a justification because, in talking to Mia, E-presto was exercising its First Amendment
freedom of speech.
will be able to establish a justification because to decide otherwise would subject Mia to involuntary servitude.
will not be able to establish a justification.
26. What guidelines has the Supreme Court set forth when awarding punitive damages in most cases?
Punitive awards should not exceed compensatory damages by more than a factor of nine.
The Supreme Court has not set any limits for punitive awards.
Punitive awards should not exceed compensatory damages by more than a factor of one hundred.
The Supreme Court has stated that punitive damages are allowed only when there are no compensatory
damages awarded.