63. A foreign company partially owned by the foreign government, manufactures televisions in the foreign country. The
cost to the company for the manufacture of the product in the U.S. is the equivalent of $100. Because of excess
production, the firm exports 5,000 sets to the United States where they are sold for $120 each. If the nearest rival
U.S.-made set sells for $150, the action of the company:
a. constitutes price-fixing.
b. violates the WTO anti-dumping provisions.
c. violates the Sherman Act, because of the involvement of the foreign government in the company.
d. appears to be legal.
64. Assume that Denmark, a member of the European Union, is contemplating the enactment of a protective tariff for its
fledgling CD industry due to domestic political and economic pressures. Assume further that the EU has a tariff that
it has also enacted for all CD manufacturers within the EU that is considerably lower than the one that is being
proposed in Denmark. The policy behind the lower EU tariff is to promote freer trade even at the risk of destroying
some of the weaker manufacturers in that organization. In this situation:
a. Denmark could enact the higher tariff since EU members give up no authority to the organization in regulating
trade and business practices.
b. Generally, when EU economic policies and rules conflict with the laws of member nations, EU law will
prevail. Thus, Denmark’s tariff may be illegal.
c. Denmark could petition the United Nations Council of Economic Policy and if it concurs with Denmark, the
EU tariff policy would be overridden.
d. Assuming Denmark is a signatory to WTO, it could retain its higher tariff since the purpose of WTO is to
protect domestic industries by promoting higher tariffs.