Fact Pattern 42-1B (Questions B12–B13 apply)
Sid, a director of Tech Software Company, learns that a Tech engineer has developed “Ur
Call,” a new, exciting video game. Sid buys Tech stock and tells his friend Velma, who also
buys Tech stock. When the new game is released three weeks later, Sid and Velma sell their
stock for a big profit.
B12. Refer to Fact Pattern 42-1B. Under SEC Rule l0b-5, Sid would not be liable if he had
waited to buy Tech stock until
a. after Sid told Velma of the new game.
b. after Velma bought Tech stock.
c. after the public release of the game.
d. just before the game was released.
B13. Refer to Fact Pattern 42-1B. Regarding Sid’s profits on the purchase and sale of Tech
stock, under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Tech may recapture
a. all of Sid’s profits.
b. half of Sid’s profits.
c. 10 percent of Sid’s profits.
d. none of Sid’s profits.
B14. Dave, an accountant, does not work for Emergent Company, but wrongfully obtains
inside information concerning Emergent. Based on the information, Dave buys and
sells Emergent stock for personal gain. The Securities and Exchange Commission
prosecutes Dave, arguing that he is liable because he stole information rightfully
belonging to another. This argument is
a. the blue-sky theory.
b. the misappropriation theory.
c. the red-herring theory.
d. the tipper/tippee theory.