B7. Ruby Red Corporation has six shareholders, four of whom are members of the same
family. All of Ruby’s shareholders agree in writing to operate without shareholders’
meetings. Under the Revised Model Business Corporation Act, this most likely
warrants
a. no penalties or sanctions.
b. the imposition of a fine on Ruby.
c. the imprisonment of Ruby’s shareholders.
d. the piercing of Ruby’s corporate veil.
B8. Miracle Vacuum, Inc., is a private, for-profit corporation that (1) was formed for the
purpose of manufacturing and distributing a newly patented appliance, (2) is owned
by five shareholders, (3) is subject to double taxation, and (4) has made no public
offering of its shares. Miracle is
a. an S corporation.
b. a closely held corporation.
c. a nonprofit corporation.
d. a professional corporation.
Fact Pattern 39-1B (Questions B9–B10 apply)
Bertram, Claudia, and Dynah form Eat Local, Inc., a closely held corporation, and agree to
restrict the transfer of its stock to anyone else. The agreement provides that if one of the
shareholders dies, his or her shares of stock in Eat Local will be divided to maintain the
proportionate control of the survivors.
B9. Refer to Fact Pattern 39-1B. A reasonable purpose for a stock transfer restriction in a
closely held corporation, like the agreement between Bertram, Claudia, and Dynah, is
a. a desire to limit the participation of outsiders in the firm.
b. a goal to restrain insiders from taking advantage of their position.
c. an attempt to restrain the free flow of commerce among investors.
d. a wish to restrict the transfer of the shareholders’ physical assets.